judgement
Subject : Environmental Law - Mining Regulations
In a significant ruling, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) addressed the issue of illegal mining activities in the Tehsil Chunar, District Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh. The case involved 20 Original Applications (OAs) filed against various mining lease holders who were accused of conducting mining operations without the necessary environmental clearances and consents from the Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB). The complainant, Sampurna Nand, raised concerns about the environmental degradation and health hazards posed by these activities.
The complainant argued that the mining operations were causing severe environmental damage, including dust pollution and structural damage to local homes due to blasting activities. The respondents, on the other hand, contended that they had obtained the necessary clearances and that the authorities had not insisted on compliance with the regulations prior to the commencement of mining.
The Tribunal analyzed the evidence presented, including a report from a Joint Committee that confirmed the absence of required clearances for the mining operations. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to environmental regulations and the necessity of obtaining Consent to Establish (CTE) and Consent to Operate (CTO) before commencing any mining activities. The court also highlighted the principle of 'Polluter Pays', which mandates that those responsible for environmental harm must compensate for the damage caused.
The NGT ordered an immediate cessation of all mining activities by the respondents until they obtained the necessary clearances. Furthermore, the Tribunal directed the respondents to pay environmental compensation for their illegal operations, calculated based on the pollution index and duration of non-compliance. The ruling underscores the court's commitment to enforcing environmental laws and protecting public health and safety.
#EnvironmentalLaw #MiningRegulations #PolluterPays #NationalGreenTribunal
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.