SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next

Court Decision

The court ruled that establishments operating without prior Environmental Clearance (EC) may continue operations pending the issuance of ex post facto EC, provided they comply with pollution norms and do not cause environmental harm. - 2025-01-31

Subject : Environmental Law - Environmental Clearance

The court ruled that establishments operating without prior Environmental Clearance (EC) may continue operations pending the issuance of ex post facto EC, provided they comply with pollution norms and do not cause environmental harm.

Supreme Today News Desk

Court Allows Operations of Factories Pending Environmental Clearance

Background

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court addressed the case involving two manufacturing units operated by M/s Pahwa Plastics Private Limited and M/s Apcolite Polymers Private Limited, which employ around 8,000 workers. The legal question centered on whether these establishments could continue operations without prior Environmental Clearance (EC) while they sought ex post facto EC.

Arguments

The appellants argued that they had obtained Consent to Establish (CTE) and Consent to Operate (CTO) from the Haryana State Pollution Control Board (HSPCB) under the impression that prior EC was not required for their operations. They contended that their units complied with pollution norms and did not cause environmental harm. Conversely, the respondent NGO, Dastak, argued for the closure of these units, emphasizing the necessity of prior EC to prevent potential environmental degradation.

Court's Analysis and Reasoning

The court analyzed the legal framework surrounding environmental regulations, including the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and relevant notifications. It acknowledged the misconception by HSPCB regarding the necessity of prior EC for the manufacturing of Formaldehyde. The court emphasized the importance of balancing economic contributions and employment against environmental protection. It noted that while ex post facto EC should not be granted routinely, it could be permissible in exceptional circumstances where the units complied with environmental norms.

Decision

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing them to continue operations pending the issuance of EC. The court directed the relevant authorities to decide on the applications for EC within one month, emphasizing that the units should not be penalized for procedural lapses when they had been operating under the belief that they were compliant with the law. This decision underscores the court's recognition of the need to protect livelihoods while ensuring adherence to environmental standards.

#EnvironmentalLaw #LegalJudgment #PollutionControl #SupremeCourtSupremeCourt

Breaking News

View All
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top