Court Decision
Subject : Disability Rights - Accessibility Law
In a landmark judgment delivered on November 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of India addressed a writ petition filed in 2005 by Rajive Raturi, a visually challenged human rights advocate. The petition sought directions to ensure meaningful access to public spaces for persons with disabilities (PWDs). The court had previously issued directives in 2017, but due to inadequate compliance from various states and union territories, it appointed the Centre for Disability Studies at NALSAR University of Law to assess the situation and recommend necessary steps.
The petitioner argued that the existing guidelines under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPWD) Act were not being effectively implemented, leading to continued barriers for PWDs in accessing public spaces and services. The Union of India, while acknowledging the need for compliance, contended that the guidelines provided a framework for gradual improvement rather than immediate enforcement.
The Supreme Court analyzed the submissions from both parties and the report submitted by NALSAR-CDS. It found that the current accessibility standards were largely recommendatory and lacked the necessary enforceability to ensure compliance. The court emphasized that accessibility is a fundamental right and must be treated as a non-negotiable requirement, rather than an aspirational goal. It highlighted the need for a clear distinction between mandatory rules and guidelines to ensure effective implementation.
The court concluded that Rule 15 of the RPWD Rules, which outlines accessibility standards, was ultra vires the RPWD Act as it failed to provide mandatory compliance mechanisms. The Union Government was directed to delineate mandatory rules within three months, ensuring that accessibility standards are enforced with tangible consequences for non-compliance. This decision is expected to significantly enhance the rights and accessibility of PWDs across India, promoting a more inclusive society.
#DisabilityRights #Accessibility #LegalReform #SupremeCourtSupremeCourt
Supreme Court Rules States Cannot Cite Financial Burden To Delay Judges Retiring At Sixty-Two
06 Aug 2026
Rajasthan High Court Demands Comprehensive Affidavit To Remove Encroachments Affecting Critical Ramgarh Dam Water Flow
06 Aug 2026
How Does Algorithmic Bias In Forest Governance Impact Adivasi Rights In Modern India Today?
06 Aug 2026
Christ University Pune Lavasa Hosts International Conference On Indian Knowledge Systems And Global Governance
06 Aug 2026
Bombay High Court Rules Pre-2015 Unilateral Arbitrator Appointments Valid if Contractually Authorized by Agreement
06 Aug 2026
Madras High Court orders TASMAC to issue bills for every liquor sale amid overcharging row
07 Aug 2026
Ernst & Young Announces Applications for Senior Associate Role in Legal Practice
08 Aug 2026
Kerala High Court Salutes R. Rajesh's Supreme Sacrifice, Urges Vigilance in Kochi Flood Prevention
08 Aug 2026
Supreme Court Backs Balanced Calcutta High Court Order on TMC Frozen Accounts in ED Probe
12 Aug 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.