SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon

Court Decision

The court ruled that existing accessibility guidelines under the RPWD Act are insufficient and must be replaced with mandatory rules to ensure compliance and effective realization of accessibility rights for persons with disabilities.

2024-11-09

Subject: Disability Rights - Accessibility Law

AI Assistant icon
The court ruled that existing accessibility guidelines under the RPWD Act are insufficient and must be replaced with mandatory rules to ensure compliance and effective realization of accessibility rights for persons with disabilities.

Supreme Today News Desk

Supreme Court Mandates Stronger Accessibility Standards for Persons with Disabilities

Background

In a landmark judgment delivered on November 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of India addressed a writ petition filed in 2005 by Rajive Raturi, a visually challenged human rights advocate. The petition sought directions to ensure meaningful access to public spaces for persons with disabilities (PWDs). The court had previously issued directives in 2017, but due to inadequate compliance from various states and union territories, it appointed the Centre for Disability Studies at NALSAR University of Law to assess the situation and recommend necessary steps.

Arguments

The petitioner argued that the existing guidelines under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPWD) Act were not being effectively implemented, leading to continued barriers for PWDs in accessing public spaces and services. The Union of India, while acknowledging the need for compliance, contended that the guidelines provided a framework for gradual improvement rather than immediate enforcement.

Court's Analysis and Reasoning

The Supreme Court analyzed the submissions from both parties and the report submitted by NALSAR-CDS. It found that the current accessibility standards were largely recommendatory and lacked the necessary enforceability to ensure compliance. The court emphasized that accessibility is a fundamental right and must be treated as a non-negotiable requirement, rather than an aspirational goal. It highlighted the need for a clear distinction between mandatory rules and guidelines to ensure effective implementation.

Decision

The court concluded that Rule 15 of the RPWD Rules, which outlines accessibility standards, was ultra vires the RPWD Act as it failed to provide mandatory compliance mechanisms. The Union Government was directed to delineate mandatory rules within three months, ensuring that accessibility standards are enforced with tangible consequences for non-compliance. This decision is expected to significantly enhance the rights and accessibility of PWDs across India, promoting a more inclusive society.

#DisabilityRights #Accessibility #LegalReform #SupremeCourtSupremeCourt

Breaking News

View All
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top