Court Decision
Subject : Disability Rights - Accessibility Law
In a landmark judgment delivered on November 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of India addressed a writ petition filed in 2005 by Rajive Raturi, a visually challenged human rights advocate. The petition sought directions to ensure meaningful access to public spaces for persons with disabilities (PWDs). The court had previously issued directives in 2017, but due to inadequate compliance from various states and union territories, it appointed the Centre for Disability Studies at NALSAR University of Law to assess the situation and recommend necessary steps.
The petitioner argued that the existing guidelines under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPWD) Act were not being effectively implemented, leading to continued barriers for PWDs in accessing public spaces and services. The Union of India, while acknowledging the need for compliance, contended that the guidelines provided a framework for gradual improvement rather than immediate enforcement.
The Supreme Court analyzed the submissions from both parties and the report submitted by NALSAR-CDS. It found that the current accessibility standards were largely recommendatory and lacked the necessary enforceability to ensure compliance. The court emphasized that accessibility is a fundamental right and must be treated as a non-negotiable requirement, rather than an aspirational goal. It highlighted the need for a clear distinction between mandatory rules and guidelines to ensure effective implementation.
The court concluded that Rule 15 of the RPWD Rules, which outlines accessibility standards, was ultra vires the RPWD Act as it failed to provide mandatory compliance mechanisms. The Union Government was directed to delineate mandatory rules within three months, ensuring that accessibility standards are enforced with tangible consequences for non-compliance. This decision is expected to significantly enhance the rights and accessibility of PWDs across India, promoting a more inclusive society.
#DisabilityRights #Accessibility #LegalReform #SupremeCourtSupremeCourt
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Ex-Parte Order Without Notice or Jurisdiction Constitutes 'Gross Abuse of Process': Rajasthan High Court
15 Jun 2026
Mandatory Administrative Enquiry Precedes FIR Against Public Servants Under SC/ST Act: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Assigning Administrative Charges to Tainted Officials Violates Natural Justice: MP High Court Quashes PWD Order
16 Jun 2026
Outsourced Employees Lack Right to Promotion; Unauthorized Designation Upgrades Are Legally Void: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Calcutta HC Questions Speaker’s Power to Appoint LoP
16 Jun 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.