Back
Next 
Court Decision
2024-09-05
Subject: Tax Law - Service Tax
In a significant ruling, the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in Chandigarh addressed the appeals filed by M/s
The appellant, represented by Shri
Conversely, the Department, represented by Shri
The Tribunal carefully analyzed the definitions of intermediary services under the relevant tax laws, including the Place of Provision of Services Rules, 2012. The court noted that for a service to be classified as intermediary, there must be a principal-agent relationship and the service must involve at least three parties. The Tribunal found that the agreements between
The court also highlighted that the appellant's role was limited to processing payments and did not involve facilitating the main service provided by
Ultimately, the Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s
Family Judge Exposes Weaponized Litigation in Custody Dispute
14 Feb 2026
Centre Notifies Two High Court Chief Justice Appointments
16 Feb 2026
Deep Chandra Joshi Appointed Acting NCLT President
16 Feb 2026
Debunking the Myth That Indians Lack Privacy Concepts
16 Feb 2026
Whose View Is It Anyway? Juniors Uncredited
16 Feb 2026
Private Property Disputes Not Human Rights Violations; HRC Lacks Jurisdiction Under PHRA: Gujarat HC
16 Feb 2026
Supreme Court Rejects Stay on RTI Data Amendments
16 Feb 2026
DIFC Court: Strong Reasons Required to Block Arbitration
17 Feb 2026
Bar Leaders Oppose High Courts Saturday Sittings
17 Feb 2026
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the definition of intermediary services and the scope of export of services under the relevant rules.
The main legal point established is that the concept of intermediary services requires a minimum of three parties, and the petitioner, in providing services directly, did not meet the definition of a....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need to examine the actual work performed by a party to determine its status under the IGST Act.
The main legal point established is that the definition of 'intermediary' under the IGST Act does not include a person who provides services on his own account, and the determination of the place of ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
