Court Decision
Subject : Energy Law - Electricity Regulation
The case involves Himachal Sorang Power Private Limited (HSPPL), which operates a hydroelectric power project in Himachal Pradesh. The company faced a legal challenge from the Central Transmission Utility India Ltd. (CTUIL) regarding outstanding transmission charges following an accident at its project site. The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) had previously ordered HSPPL to pay these charges, leading to HSPPL's appeal.
HSPPL argued that a force majeure event, specifically an accident resulting in the failure of a penstock, prevented it from operating its plant and thus from generating power. They contended that this event exempted them from paying transmission charges as per the terms of their agreements. Conversely, CTUIL maintained that HSPPL was liable for the charges as the long-term access (LTA) had been granted and operationalized, regardless of the accident.
The court examined the circumstances surrounding the accident and the subsequent directives from the Government of Himachal Pradesh, which halted all operations at the project site. It acknowledged that the accident was widely reported and that CTUIL was aware of the situation. The court found that the accident constituted a force majeure event, which legally absolved HSPPL from the obligation to pay transmission charges during the period affected by the incident.
The court ruled in favor of HSPPL, setting aside the CERC's order that mandated payment of transmission charges. It directed that any excess payments made by HSPPL during the force majeure period should be reimbursed along with carrying costs. This decision underscores the importance of recognizing force majeure events in contractual obligations within the energy sector.
#EnergyLaw #ForceMajeure #ElectricityRegulation
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
CJI Declares Sikkim India's First Paperless Judiciary
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.