Court Decision
Subject : Energy Law - Renewable Energy
In a significant ruling, the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission's decision regarding Waaneep Solar Pvt. Ltd. (WSPL) was challenged in two appeals. The central issue revolved around the Scheduled Commercial Operation Date (SCOD) of WSPL's 25 MW solar power project at
WSPL argued that the delays were due to several factors, including changes in project locations, land acquisition issues, and adverse weather conditions. They sought to have the SCOD revised to September 29, 2016, and requested the refund of penalties amounting to approximately Rs. 18.74 crores. Conversely, the Southern Power Distribution Company (SPDC) contended that the project was not completed on time and that the penalties imposed were justified under the terms of the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA).
The court analyzed the arguments presented by both parties, noting that while WSPL had injected power into the grid starting from May 2016, the formal synchronization and necessary inspections were not completed until September 29, 2016. However, the court found that SPDC had effectively accepted the power injected by WSPL without formally objecting to the lack of synchronization, which led to the conclusion that the SCOD should be recognized as July 28, 2016. The court emphasized that the imposition of liquidated damages was excessive, especially since SPDC had benefited from the power supplied.
The court ruled in favor of WSPL, declaring the SCOD as July 28, 2016, and ordered the immediate refund of the penalty amount of Rs. 18.74 crores. The appeal by SPDC regarding the recovery of GST on the liquidated damages was dismissed, reinforcing the court's stance on the unjust nature of the penalties imposed. This ruling highlights the importance of clear communication and adherence to contractual obligations in the renewable energy sector.
#EnergyLaw #SolarPower #LegalJudgment
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.