Court Decision
Subject : Energy Law - Renewable Energy
In a significant ruling, the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission's decision regarding Waaneep Solar Pvt. Ltd. (WSPL) was challenged in two appeals. The central issue revolved around the Scheduled Commercial Operation Date (SCOD) of WSPL's 25 MW solar power project at
WSPL argued that the delays were due to several factors, including changes in project locations, land acquisition issues, and adverse weather conditions. They sought to have the SCOD revised to September 29, 2016, and requested the refund of penalties amounting to approximately Rs. 18.74 crores. Conversely, the Southern Power Distribution Company (SPDC) contended that the project was not completed on time and that the penalties imposed were justified under the terms of the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA).
The court analyzed the arguments presented by both parties, noting that while WSPL had injected power into the grid starting from May 2016, the formal synchronization and necessary inspections were not completed until September 29, 2016. However, the court found that SPDC had effectively accepted the power injected by WSPL without formally objecting to the lack of synchronization, which led to the conclusion that the SCOD should be recognized as July 28, 2016. The court emphasized that the imposition of liquidated damages was excessive, especially since SPDC had benefited from the power supplied.
The court ruled in favor of WSPL, declaring the SCOD as July 28, 2016, and ordered the immediate refund of the penalty amount of Rs. 18.74 crores. The appeal by SPDC regarding the recovery of GST on the liquidated damages was dismissed, reinforcing the court's stance on the unjust nature of the penalties imposed. This ruling highlights the importance of clear communication and adherence to contractual obligations in the renewable energy sector.
#EnergyLaw #SolarPower #LegalJudgment
Rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act Prevail Over Detention Period Claims: High Court of J&K and Ladakh
11 Mar 2026
Failure to Pay Compensation Vitiates Limitation Claims in Land Acquisition: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
04 Mar 2026
Discretionary Nature of Section 143-A NI Act: J&K&L High Court Upholds Interim Compensation Based on Accused's Conduct
12 Jun 2026
Salman Khan Files Delhi HC Plea Against 'Kala Hiran'
12 Jun 2026
Writ Court Cannot Exercise Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Relief After Directing Litigant to Civil Forum: MP High Court
12 Jun 2026
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.