Back
Next 
Court Decision
2024-12-18
Subject: Energy Law - Renewable Energy
In a significant ruling, the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission's decision regarding Waaneep Solar Pvt. Ltd. (WSPL) was challenged in two appeals. The central issue revolved around the Scheduled Commercial Operation Date (SCOD) of WSPL's 25 MW solar power project at
WSPL argued that the delays were due to several factors, including changes in project locations, land acquisition issues, and adverse weather conditions. They sought to have the SCOD revised to September 29, 2016, and requested the refund of penalties amounting to approximately Rs. 18.74 crores. Conversely, the Southern Power Distribution Company (SPDC) contended that the project was not completed on time and that the penalties imposed were justified under the terms of the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA).
The court analyzed the arguments presented by both parties, noting that while WSPL had injected power into the grid starting from May 2016, the formal synchronization and necessary inspections were not completed until September 29, 2016. However, the court found that SPDC had effectively accepted the power injected by WSPL without formally objecting to the lack of synchronization, which led to the conclusion that the SCOD should be recognized as July 28, 2016. The court emphasized that the imposition of liquidated damages was excessive, especially since SPDC had benefited from the power supplied.
The court ruled in favor of WSPL, declaring the SCOD as July 28, 2016, and ordered the immediate refund of the penalty amount of Rs. 18.74 crores. The appeal by SPDC regarding the recovery of GST on the liquidated damages was dismissed, reinforcing the court's stance on the unjust nature of the penalties imposed. This ruling highlights the importance of clear communication and adherence to contractual obligations in the renewable energy sector.
Family Judge Exposes Weaponized Litigation in Custody Dispute
14 Feb 2026
Centre Notifies Two High Court Chief Justice Appointments
16 Feb 2026
Deep Chandra Joshi Appointed Acting NCLT President
16 Feb 2026
Debunking the Myth That Indians Lack Privacy Concepts
16 Feb 2026
Whose View Is It Anyway? Juniors Uncredited
16 Feb 2026
Private Property Disputes Not Human Rights Violations; HRC Lacks Jurisdiction Under PHRA: Gujarat HC
16 Feb 2026
Supreme Court Rejects Stay on RTI Data Amendments
16 Feb 2026
DIFC Court: Strong Reasons Required to Block Arbitration
17 Feb 2026
Bar Leaders Oppose High Courts Saturday Sittings
17 Feb 2026
(1) Appeal to Supreme Court – Requirement under Section 125 of Electricity Act, 2003 is not merely a ‘question of a law’ but a ‘substantial question of law’ – APTEL as an appellate body is to hear ap....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
