Court Decision
Subject : Corporate Law - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
The recent judgment by the Supreme Court addresses the jurisdiction of Special Courts in relation to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The case arose from an appeal against a decision by the Bombay High Court, which had quashed proceedings against former directors of SBM Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. The directors,
The Appellant, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), argued that the High Court erred in its interpretation of the jurisdiction of Special Courts under the IBC. They contended that the Special Court established under Chapter XXVIII of the Companies Act, 2013 should have jurisdiction to try offences under the IBC. Conversely, the Respondents claimed that the High Court's ruling was justified, asserting that the amendments to the Companies Act limited the jurisdiction of Special Courts to offences under the Companies Act alone.
The Supreme Court analyzed the provisions of Section 236(1) of the IBC, which states that offences under the Code shall be tried by the Special Court established under the Companies Act. The Court concluded that this reference is specific and constitutes 'legislation by incorporation', meaning that the provisions of the Companies Act as they existed at the time the IBC was enacted remain applicable. The Court emphasized that subsequent amendments to the Companies Act do not affect the jurisdiction established under the IBC.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the Bombay High Court's decision. It ruled that the Special Court presided over by a Sessions Judge or Additional Sessions Judge has the jurisdiction to try the complaint under the IBC. The matter was remitted back to the High Court for consideration on the merits of the case, acknowledging that the Respondents have a valid case that warrants further examination.
#InsolvencyLaw #CorporateLaw #LegalJudgment #SupremeCourtSupremeCourt
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.