Court Decision
Subject : Corporate Law - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court addressed the claims of 272 employees and workmen of M/s ABG Shipyard Limited, who sought unpaid wages and salaries during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The employees, working at the company's Dahej and Mumbai offices, appealed against the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's decision that dismissed their claims for salary relief during the insolvency proceedings.
The appellants argued that they were entitled to their wages for the entire duration of the CIRP, asserting that they remained on the payroll and were instructed to report to the Resolution Professional (RP). They contended that the RP's management of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern mandated the payment of their salaries as part of the CIRP costs.
Conversely, the Liquidator argued that the majority of the employees did not perform any work during the CIRP and thus their claims could not be classified as CIRP costs. The Liquidator maintained that only those who assisted in the insolvency process were entitled to payment, and the remaining claims should be treated under the standard liquidation process.
The court analyzed the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), particularly focusing on the definition of "insolvency resolution process costs." It emphasized that only the wages of those employees who actually worked during the CIRP, while the Corporate Debtor was managed as a going concern, could be included in the CIRP costs. The court noted that the burden of proof lay with the employees to establish their claims.
The court also highlighted that the dues related to provident funds, gratuity, and pensions are excluded from the liquidation estate assets, ensuring that these funds remain protected for the employees.
The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal, directing the Liquidator to adjudicate the claims of the employees based on evidence presented. If it is established that the Corporate Debtor was a going concern during the CIRP and that the employees worked during that time, their wages would be included in the CIRP costs and paid in full. The court mandated that this process be completed within twelve weeks, ensuring that the employees' claims are addressed fairly and promptly.
This ruling underscores the importance of employee rights in insolvency proceedings and clarifies the conditions under which employee claims can be prioritized during corporate insolvency.
#InsolvencyLaw #EmployeeRights #CorporateDebtor #SupremeCourtSupremeCourt
CJI Declares Sikkim India's First Paperless Judiciary
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
Administrative Actions Judged on Materials at Time of Decision, Not Subsequent Developments: Patna High Court
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
Defying Transfer Order Justifies Removal from Service Despite Family Care Plea: Orissa High Court
01 May 2026
Post-Conviction NDPS Bail Can't Be Granted Solely on Long Incarceration; Section 37 Twin Conditions Mandatory: J&K&L High Court
01 May 2026
Delhi HC Closes ANI's Copyright Suit Against PTI After Amicable Settlement Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC
01 May 2026
Arbitrary Road Height Raising Banned Without Approval: Patna HC Enforces SOP, Penalizes Contractors
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Dismisses FIR Plea Against Rahul Gandhi
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.