SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next

Court Decision

The court ruled that wages and salaries of workmen during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) can be included in CIRP costs only if it is established that the Corporate Debtor was a going concern and that the workmen actually worked during that period. - 2025-02-04

Subject : Corporate Law - Insolvency and Bankruptcy

The court ruled that wages and salaries of workmen during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) can be included in CIRP costs only if it is established that the Corporate Debtor was a going concern and that the workmen actually worked during that period.

Supreme Today News Desk

Court Ruling on Employee Claims During Corporate Insolvency

Background

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court addressed the claims of 272 employees and workmen of M/s ABG Shipyard Limited, who sought unpaid wages and salaries during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The employees, working at the company's Dahej and Mumbai offices, appealed against the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's decision that dismissed their claims for salary relief during the insolvency proceedings.

Arguments

The appellants argued that they were entitled to their wages for the entire duration of the CIRP, asserting that they remained on the payroll and were instructed to report to the Resolution Professional (RP). They contended that the RP's management of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern mandated the payment of their salaries as part of the CIRP costs.

Conversely, the Liquidator argued that the majority of the employees did not perform any work during the CIRP and thus their claims could not be classified as CIRP costs. The Liquidator maintained that only those who assisted in the insolvency process were entitled to payment, and the remaining claims should be treated under the standard liquidation process.

Court's Analysis and Reasoning

The court analyzed the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), particularly focusing on the definition of "insolvency resolution process costs." It emphasized that only the wages of those employees who actually worked during the CIRP, while the Corporate Debtor was managed as a going concern, could be included in the CIRP costs. The court noted that the burden of proof lay with the employees to establish their claims.

The court also highlighted that the dues related to provident funds, gratuity, and pensions are excluded from the liquidation estate assets, ensuring that these funds remain protected for the employees.

Decision

The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal, directing the Liquidator to adjudicate the claims of the employees based on evidence presented. If it is established that the Corporate Debtor was a going concern during the CIRP and that the employees worked during that time, their wages would be included in the CIRP costs and paid in full. The court mandated that this process be completed within twelve weeks, ensuring that the employees' claims are addressed fairly and promptly.

This ruling underscores the importance of employee rights in insolvency proceedings and clarifies the conditions under which employee claims can be prioritized during corporate insolvency.

#InsolvencyLaw #EmployeeRights #CorporateDebtor #SupremeCourtSupremeCourt

Breaking News

View All
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top