Back
Next 
Court Decision
2024-09-28
Subject: Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction
In a significant ruling, the High Court at Calcutta addressed the case of M/S Kedia Fintrade Pvt Limited and others versus the Union of India and others. The petitioners sought to quash the freezing orders issued by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The case arose from an investigation linked to alleged money laundering activities involving a client of Kedia Fintrade, Vikas Chhaparia, who was implicated in a broader scheme involving online betting through the Mahadev Book App.
The petitioners, represented by a team of senior advocates, argued that:
- They were not named in any FIR related to the predicate offence and had cooperated fully with the ED's investigation.
- The freezing orders were issued without proper authorization and lacked the necessary '
Conversely, the ED contended that: - The freezing orders were valid as they were part of a nationwide investigation into money laundering activities linked to the Mahadev Book App. - The ED had followed the necessary procedures and had the authority to conduct searches and issue freezing orders based on the evidence gathered.
The court examined the procedural validity of the ED's actions, focusing on the authorization for the freezing orders. It found that: - The Assistant Director of the ED had acted without proper authorization from the Director, rendering the freezing orders null and void. - The court emphasized that the PMLA requires strict adherence to procedural safeguards, particularly when imposing severe penalties such as freezing assets. - The court also noted that the ED's reliance on a mechanical process without adequate reasoning violated the statutory requirements of the PMLA.
Ultimately, the High Court dismissed the ED's freezing orders against Kedia Fintrade Pvt Ltd, highlighting the importance of following legal protocols in enforcement actions. The ruling underscores the necessity for regulatory bodies to operate within the bounds of the law, ensuring that individuals' rights are protected against arbitrary actions. The court's decision not only provides relief to the petitioners but also sets a precedent for future cases involving the enforcement of the PMLA.
Patna HC Quashes Cognizance Against Minister Sans Assault Allegations
06 Feb 2026
Supreme Court Directs Trial Courts to Inform Accused of Legal Aid Rights Before Witness Examination
07 Feb 2026
Law Ministry Reveals 73% Upper Caste Judges Since 2021
07 Feb 2026
Dwivedi: British Geopolitics Created Pakistan, Not Jinnah
07 Feb 2026
Court Remands Influencer Adhikary to 10-Day Custody in Rape Case
07 Feb 2026
From ‘Rizz’ to Rights: Modernizing Legal Language
09 Feb 2026
Gen Z Reshapes Law with Concise Rulings
09 Feb 2026
High Courts' Acquittal Rate in Death Penalty Cases Four Times Confirmation: NALSAR Report
09 Feb 2026
NLUO Launches MBA in Healthcare Management and Law to Integrate Regulatory Expertise with Leadership
09 Feb 2026
The court affirmed that the Enforcement Directorate's actions under the PMLA were valid, emphasizing the importance of statutory compliance in search and seizure operations.
Court held that actions of the Enforcement Directorate were not legally sustainable post-appellate tribunal's decision.
The court established that the closure of a predicate offence negates the basis for any subsequent money laundering investigation under the PML Act.
(1) Scheduled offences – When predicate offence is not in existence, ED cannot continue its investigation on proceeds of crime emanating out of predicate offence.
(2) Power conferred on High Court....
It is a well-settled salutary principle that if a statute provides for a thing to be done in a particular manner, then it has to be done in that manner and in no other manner.
Adjudicating authority is empowered by virtue of Section 20(1) of Act of 2002 to direct continuation of freezing of Bank Account.
Point of Law : When there is no FIR registered, hypostised on which an 'ECIR' is also not available, any investigation against petitioner under 'PMLA' will have to cease.
Court cannot take cognizance and quash or stay criminal proceedings without having territorial jurisdiction.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
