Court Decision
Subject : Corporate Law - Companies Act
In a significant ruling, the High Court addressed the jurisdiction of the Special Court concerning offences under Section 452 of the Companies Act, 2013. The case involved
The revision petitioner, represented by its counsel, argued that the Special Court had jurisdiction to try offences under Section 452 prior to the amendments made by Act 29 of 2020. They contended that the substantive sentence for the offence included imprisonment, thus falling within the Special Court's purview. Conversely, the accused's counsel maintained that the offence was not punishable by imprisonment of two years or more, asserting that the complaints should have been filed before a Judicial Magistrate of First Class.
The court meticulously analyzed the provisions of the Companies Act, particularly focusing on the amendments made to Section 435. It concluded that prior to the amendment, the Special Court had the authority to try offences under Section 452, which included a substantive sentence of imprisonment for disobedience of court orders. The court emphasized that the distinction between the two parts of Section 452 was crucial, noting that while the first part dealt with fines, the second part allowed for imprisonment upon non-compliance with court orders.
The High Court ultimately set aside the Special Court's earlier ruling, affirming that it indeed had jurisdiction to hear the complaints filed by
#CorporateLaw #CompaniesAct #LegalJurisdiction #KeralaHighCourt
Madras HC Directs Municipality to Auction Amusement Rides Licenses on Vaigai Riverbed for Chithirai Festival: Madurai Bench
17 Apr 2026
TCS Nashik Accused Seek Bail in Harassment Probe
17 Apr 2026
Insurer Liable for Gratuitous Passenger in Goods Vehicle, Can Recover from Owner: Kerala High Court
17 Apr 2026
MP High Court Issues Notice in PIL Alleging Disrespect to National Song 'Vande Mataram' by Indore Councillors: Article 51A(a)
17 Apr 2026
Bombay HC Grants NSE Ad-Interim Relief Against Fake Social Media Accounts Infringing 'NSE' Trademark: Platforms Must Takedown in 36 Hours
18 Apr 2026
Supreme Court Tags Challenges to UP Gangsters Act with Similar Organised Crime Laws from Gujarat, Maharashtra: Refers to 3-Judge Bench
18 Apr 2026
Loan Repayments for Assets Can't Reduce Maintenance Under Section 144 BNSS: Supreme Court
18 Apr 2026
Fernandez Seeks to Turn Approver in ₹200 Cr PMLA Case
18 Apr 2026
Prosecution Can't Gatekeep Witnesses: Rajasthan HC Directs Summoning of Doctor Under Section 311 CrPC for Just Decision
18 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.