Court Decision
Subject : Corporate Law - Companies Act
In a significant ruling, the High Court addressed the jurisdiction of the Special Court concerning offences under Section 452 of the Companies Act, 2013. The case involved
The revision petitioner, represented by its counsel, argued that the Special Court had jurisdiction to try offences under Section 452 prior to the amendments made by Act 29 of 2020. They contended that the substantive sentence for the offence included imprisonment, thus falling within the Special Court's purview. Conversely, the accused's counsel maintained that the offence was not punishable by imprisonment of two years or more, asserting that the complaints should have been filed before a Judicial Magistrate of First Class.
The court meticulously analyzed the provisions of the Companies Act, particularly focusing on the amendments made to Section 435. It concluded that prior to the amendment, the Special Court had the authority to try offences under Section 452, which included a substantive sentence of imprisonment for disobedience of court orders. The court emphasized that the distinction between the two parts of Section 452 was crucial, noting that while the first part dealt with fines, the second part allowed for imprisonment upon non-compliance with court orders.
The High Court ultimately set aside the Special Court's earlier ruling, affirming that it indeed had jurisdiction to hear the complaints filed by
#CorporateLaw #CompaniesAct #LegalJurisdiction #KeralaHighCourt
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.