Court Decision
Subject : Corporate Law - Companies Act
In a significant ruling, the High Court addressed the jurisdiction of the Special Court concerning offences under Section 452 of the Companies Act, 2013. The case involved
The revision petitioner, represented by its counsel, argued that the Special Court had jurisdiction to try offences under Section 452 prior to the amendments made by Act 29 of 2020. They contended that the substantive sentence for the offence included imprisonment, thus falling within the Special Court's purview. Conversely, the accused's counsel maintained that the offence was not punishable by imprisonment of two years or more, asserting that the complaints should have been filed before a Judicial Magistrate of First Class.
The court meticulously analyzed the provisions of the Companies Act, particularly focusing on the amendments made to Section 435. It concluded that prior to the amendment, the Special Court had the authority to try offences under Section 452, which included a substantive sentence of imprisonment for disobedience of court orders. The court emphasized that the distinction between the two parts of Section 452 was crucial, noting that while the first part dealt with fines, the second part allowed for imprisonment upon non-compliance with court orders.
The High Court ultimately set aside the Special Court's earlier ruling, affirming that it indeed had jurisdiction to hear the complaints filed by
#CorporateLaw #CompaniesAct #LegalJurisdiction #KeralaHighCourt
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Ex-Parte Order Without Notice or Jurisdiction Constitutes 'Gross Abuse of Process': Rajasthan High Court
15 Jun 2026
Mandatory Administrative Enquiry Precedes FIR Against Public Servants Under SC/ST Act: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Assigning Administrative Charges to Tainted Officials Violates Natural Justice: MP High Court Quashes PWD Order
16 Jun 2026
Outsourced Employees Lack Right to Promotion; Unauthorized Designation Upgrades Are Legally Void: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Calcutta HC Questions Speaker’s Power to Appoint LoP
16 Jun 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.