Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Belated Challenge by Non-Bidders to GeM Tender Conditions for School Sports Equipment Not Maintainable: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
#MedicalNegligence #ConsumerCourt
Kidney Stone Nightmare: Delhi Commission Rejects Doctor's Appeal, Sticks with ₹1 Lakh Penalty for Botched SurgeryIn a ruling that underscores the critical role of verifiable medical records in negligence claims, theDelhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissionhas dismissed...
#ConsumerProtection #EPFODelay
EPFO's Decade-Long PF Limbo Ends in ₹50,000 Penalty: Chandigarh Consumer Court Slams 'Unexplained' DelayIn a ruling that underscores accountability for public bodies handling workers' savings, theDistrict Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-II, U.T. Chandigarh, held theEmployees Provident ...
#DeficiencyInService #ConsumerProtection
When Wedding Memories Fade: Kottayam Court Slaps ₹2.5 Lakh Penalty on PhotographersIn a ruling that underscores the sanctity of wedding service contracts, theDistrict Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kottayamhas held wedding photographersPiccolo Weddingsand proprietorMr....
#ConsumerProtection #AirlineLiability
Umrah Pilgrims' Sacred Souvenirs Vanish: IndiGo Slapped with ₹1.19 Lakh Fine by J&K Consumer CourtIn a ruling that underscores airlines' accountability for baggage blunders, theDistrict Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Baramulla/Bandipora, presided over byP...
#NCDRC #Demonetisation
NCDRC Slaps Axis Bank with ₹3.19 Crore Payout Over Demonetisation Deposit DebacleIn a scathing verdict delivered on March 10, 2026, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) held Axis Bank liable fordeficiency in serviceafter it refused to accept demonetised notes from Procu...
#ConsumerProtectionAct #DeficiencyInService #BurdenOfProof
State Commission Upholds Dismissal of Solar Panel Complaint, Cites Lack of Evidence for 'Deficiency in Service' New Delhi– The Consumer State Commission, presided over by Sangita Dhingra Sehgal (President) and Ms. Pinki (Member, Judicial), has dismissed an appeal filed by a consumer against L...
#ConsumerProtectionAct #ManufacturingDefect #CorporateLiability
Chandigarh Commission Orders BMW to Refund ₹1.3 Crore for Defective X7, Cites 'Inherent Manufacturing Defect' Chandigarh, India– The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Chandigarh has delivered a significant ruling, directing BMW India to refund the full purchase price of ₹1.329 c...
MedicalNegligence InformedConsent VicariousLiability
Max Hospital and Doctor Ordered to Pay ₹10 Lakh for Negligence After Patient's Death, Cites Lack of Informed Consent Dehradun, Consumer State Commission:The Consumer State Commission has held Max Super Speciality Hospital, Dehradun, and one of its doctors jointly and severally liable for medi...
#ConsumerProtection #RealEstateLaw #DeficiencyInService
Developer Ordered to Refund Over Rs. 40 Lakh for Failure to Deliver Flat, Consumer Commission Cites "Deficiency in Service" NEW DELHI– The Consumer State Commission, presided over by Chief Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal and Justice Ms. Pinki, has ruled in favor of a homebuyer, ordering M/s. K...
#ConsumerProtectionAct #RealEstateLaw #RERA
Developer and Marketing Agent Held Jointly Liable for Project Delay; Disclaimer No Excuse for Misleading Ads, Rules CommissionMumbai, July 29, 2025– The Consumer State Commission has delivered a significant ruling in favour of a homebuyer, holding both the developer and its marketing partner ...
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.