Subject :
O R D E R
1 By the impugned order dated 3 March 2023, the High Court of Delhi has allowed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 and referred the parties to arbitration by a sole arbitrator.
2 On 21 April 2023, this Court directed that the proceedings be listed immediately after the decision of the Constitution Bench in Cox and Kings Ltd vs SAP India Private Limited and Another1 . The judgment of the Constitution Bench has been delivered on 6 December 2023 and is reported as 2023 SCC Online SC 1634.
3 We have heard Mr Ritin Rai, senior counsel for the petitioner and Dr S Muralidhar, senior counsel for the first respondent. The second respondent, the Court is informed, has been deleted from the array of parties in the course of the arbitration proceedings.
4 The petitioner has instituted an application under Section 16 before the sole arbitrator. On 6 January 2024 when the proceedings were listed before the learned sole arbitrator, the petitioner stated that a clarification would be 1 Arbitration Petition No 38 of 2020 sought before this Court in the present proceedings.
5 Mr Ritin Rai, senior counsel for the petitioner has submitted that all that needs to be clarified by this Court is that it would be open to the petitioner to raise all appropriate defenses before the sole arbitrator bearing in mind the parameters which have been laid down in the judgment of the Constitution Bench bearing on the Group of Companies doctrine.
6 Dr S Muralidhar, senior counsel for the first respondent submits that the first respondent would also urge all appropriate submissions in that regard before the sole arbitrator.
7 Bearing in mind the above submissions, we clarify that the learned sole arbitrator may decide on the application under Section 16 uninfluenced by the observations contained in the impugned order dated 3 March 2023 which is confined only to the purpose of deciding the petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996.
8 Subject to the above clarification, the Special Leave Petitions are disposed of.
9 Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(CHETAN KUMAR) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)
A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
Rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act Prevail Over Detention Period Claims: High Court of J&K and Ladakh
11 Mar 2026
Failure to Pay Compensation Vitiates Limitation Claims in Land Acquisition: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
04 Mar 2026
Discretionary Nature of Section 143-A NI Act: J&K&L High Court Upholds Interim Compensation Based on Accused's Conduct
12 Jun 2026
Salman Khan Files Delhi HC Plea Against 'Kala Hiran'
12 Jun 2026
Writ Court Cannot Exercise Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Relief After Directing Litigant to Civil Forum: MP High Court
12 Jun 2026
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.