Subject :
O R D E R
1 By the impugned order dated 3 March 2023, the High Court of Delhi has allowed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 and referred the parties to arbitration by a sole arbitrator.
2 On 21 April 2023, this Court directed that the proceedings be listed immediately after the decision of the Constitution Bench in Cox and Kings Ltd vs SAP India Private Limited and Another1 . The judgment of the Constitution Bench has been delivered on 6 December 2023 and is reported as 2023 SCC Online SC 1634.
3 We have heard Mr Ritin Rai, senior counsel for the petitioner and Dr S Muralidhar, senior counsel for the first respondent. The second respondent, the Court is informed, has been deleted from the array of parties in the course of the arbitration proceedings.
4 The petitioner has instituted an application under Section 16 before the sole arbitrator. On 6 January 2024 when the proceedings were listed before the learned sole arbitrator, the petitioner stated that a clarification would be 1 Arbitration Petition No 38 of 2020 sought before this Court in the present proceedings.
5 Mr Ritin Rai, senior counsel for the petitioner has submitted that all that needs to be clarified by this Court is that it would be open to the petitioner to raise all appropriate defenses before the sole arbitrator bearing in mind the parameters which have been laid down in the judgment of the Constitution Bench bearing on the Group of Companies doctrine.
6 Dr S Muralidhar, senior counsel for the first respondent submits that the first respondent would also urge all appropriate submissions in that regard before the sole arbitrator.
7 Bearing in mind the above submissions, we clarify that the learned sole arbitrator may decide on the application under Section 16 uninfluenced by the observations contained in the impugned order dated 3 March 2023 which is confined only to the purpose of deciding the petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996.
8 Subject to the above clarification, the Special Leave Petitions are disposed of.
9 Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(CHETAN KUMAR) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)
A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.