Search Results for "consumer state News | Supremetoday AI"

Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Debenture Trustee & Rating Agencies Held Liable for Investor's Loss Post-'AAA' to 'D' Downgrade, says Chandigarh Consumer Commission.

Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Debenture Trustee & Rating Agencies Held Liable for Investor's Loss Post-'AAA' to 'D' Downgrade, says Chandigarh Consumer Commission.

#ConsumerProtection #SEBI #DebentureTrustee

Debenture Trustee and Rating Agencies Held Liable for Investor's Loss in DHFL Collapse, Ordered to Pay Compensation Chandigarh, U.T.– The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh, has held a debenture trustee and two credit rating agencies liable for deficiency in service and ...

India - Consumer State Case Law 05 Aug 2025
Citing 'Sufficient Cause' Principle, UP State Consumer Commission Rejects 583-Day Delay Condonation Appeal by Insurance Co. Under S.41 Consumer Protection Act

Citing 'Sufficient Cause' Principle, UP State Consumer Commission Rejects 583-Day Delay Condonation Appeal by Insurance Co. Under S.41 Consumer Protection Act

#ConsumerProtectionAct #LimitationPeriod #InsuranceDispute

UP Consumer Commission Dismisses Insurer's Appeal, Cites 'Inordinate and Unexplained' 583-Day Delay Lucknow:The Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has dismissed an appeal filed by United India Insurance Company Limited, citing an extraordinary and insufficiently explai...

India - Consumer State Case Law 04 Aug 2025
Pecuniary Jurisdiction Under Consumer Protection Act 2019 Depends on 'Consideration Paid', Not Claimed Compensation: UP State Consumer Commission

Pecuniary Jurisdiction Under Consumer Protection Act 2019 Depends on 'Consideration Paid', Not Claimed Compensation: UP State Consumer Commission

#ConsumerProtectionAct2019 #PecuniaryJurisdiction #ConsumerLaw

UP Consumer Commission Clarifies Pecuniary Jurisdiction Under 2019 Act, Returns Insurance Claim Case to District Forum Kanpur, U.P.- The Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, in a significant ruling, has clarified the criteria for determining pecuniary jurisdiction under...

India - Consumer State Case Law 01 Aug 2025
Marketing Partner's Disclaimer No Shield Against Liability For Misleading Ads Under S. 2(28) Consumer Protection Act: Consumer State Commission

Marketing Partner's Disclaimer No Shield Against Liability For Misleading Ads Under S. 2(28) Consumer Protection Act: Consumer State Commission

#ConsumerProtectionAct #RealEstateLaw #RERA

Developer and Marketing Agent Held Jointly Liable for Project Delay; Disclaimer No Excuse for Misleading Ads, Rules CommissionMumbai, July 29, 2025– The Consumer State Commission has delivered a significant ruling in favour of a homebuyer, holding both the developer and its marketing partner ...

India - Consumer State Case Law 29 Jul 2025
Medical Negligence Claim Fails Due to Lack of Proof, Continued Patient-Doctor Relationship: Rajasthan State Consumer Commission

Medical Negligence Claim Fails Due to Lack of Proof, Continued Patient-Doctor Relationship: Rajasthan State Consumer Commission

MedicalNegligence ConsumerProtectionAct BurdenOfProof

Rajasthan State Consumer Commission Dismisses Medical Negligence Appeal, Cites Lack of Evidence and Patient's Continued Trust in Doctor Bikaner, Rajasthan– The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has upheld a District Forum order dismissing a medical negligence complaint against an E...

India - Consumer State Case Law 29 Jul 2025
Non-Disclosure Of Prior Policies In Proposal Form Is A Valid Ground For Repudiation Of Insurance Claim: Rajasthan State Consumer Commission

Non-Disclosure Of Prior Policies In Proposal Form Is A Valid Ground For Repudiation Of Insurance Claim: Rajasthan State Consumer Commission

InsuranceLaw ConsumerProtection MaterialFact

Non-Disclosure of Prior Policies is a Valid Ground for Repudiation, Upholds Rajasthan State Consumer Commission Jodhpur:The Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, in a significant ruling on insurance law, has upheld the repudiation of a life insurance claim on the grounds of ...

India - Consumer State Case Law 26 Jul 2025
Consumer Complaint Barred by Limitation if Filed Years After DRT Recovery Proceedings Commence: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Commission

Consumer Complaint Barred by Limitation if Filed Years After DRT Recovery Proceedings Commence: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Commission

ConsumerProtection LimitationPeriod BankingLaw

State Consumer Commission Dismisses Appeal, Upholds Dismissal of Complaint Against Canara Bank Citing 1965-Day Delay Raipur, Chhattisgarh- The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chhattisgarh, has upheld a District Commission order, dismissing an appeal filed by a borrower against C...

India - Consumer State Case Law 23 Jul 2025
Insured’s Negligence and Unexplained Delay in FIR Justify Claim Repudiation: UP State Consumer Commission

Insured’s Negligence and Unexplained Delay in FIR Justify Claim Repudiation: UP State Consumer Commission

InsuranceLaw ConsumerProtection ClaimRepudiation

UP Consumer Commission Upholds Insurance Claim Denial Citing Delay in FIR and Insured's Negligence Lucknow, U.P.- The Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) has dismissed an appeal against an insurance company's decision to repudiate a vehicle theft claim, holding ...

India - Consumer State Case Law 23 Jul 2025
Death While Fleeing Police Raid on Gambling Den Not Covered by Accident Insurance Due to 'Illegal Act' Exclusion Clause: UP State Consumer Commission

Death While Fleeing Police Raid on Gambling Den Not Covered by Accident Insurance Due to 'Illegal Act' Exclusion Clause: UP State Consumer Commission

#InsuranceLaw #ExclusionClause #ConsumerProtection

Death While Fleeing Police Raid on Gambling Den Falls Under 'Illegal Act' Exclusion, No Insurance Payout: UP State Consumer Commission Lucknow, U.P.- The Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has upheld an insurance company's decision to reject a ₹20 lakh personal acciden...

India - Consumer State Case Law 22 Jul 2025
Vehicle Being 'Blacklisted' by RTO for Unpaid Challan is No Ground to Repudiate Insurance Claim: State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Vehicle Being 'Blacklisted' by RTO for Unpaid Challan is No Ground to Repudiate Insurance Claim: State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

ConsumerProtection InsuranceLaw VehicleInsurance

Vehicle 'Blacklisted' by RTO Not a Valid Reason to Deny Insurance Claim, Rules State Consumer Commission Jaipur:The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has ruled that an insurance company cannot repudiate a valid accident claim solely on the grounds that the vehicle's registration wa...

India - Consumer State Case Law 22 Jul 2025
SupremeToday Landscape Ad
SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top