News Updates
Rajya Sabha Bill Seeks To Criminalize Vande Mataram Disruption Under The National Honour Act
27 Jul 2026
Will Competitive Exams Deplete Delhi District Courts of Judges During Crucial Trial Proceedings This Year?
27 Jul 2026
Bombay High Court Adjourns Defamation Case Involving Union Minister Nitin Gadkari And Online Media Platforms
28 Jul 2026
Rajasthan High Court Directs State to Form Separate Wings for Crime Investigation and Security
28 Jul 2026
Gujarat High Court Upholds Constitutionality Of CGST Section 16 2 c Denying Unpaid Input Tax
28 Jul 2026
Punjab and Haryana High Court Issues New Guidelines For Legal Aid Defense Counsel System
28 Jul 2026
Government Introduces Public Examinations Amendment Bill 2026 In Lok Sabha To Curb Exam Paper Leaks
28 Jul 2026
Should Delhi High Court Increase Pecuniary Jurisdiction of District Courts to ₹10 Crore Threshold?
28 Jul 2026
Government Disclosure Reveals Urgent Staffing Crisis Across Numerous Regional Armed Forces Tribunal India Benches
29 Jul 2026
Search Results for "consumer state News | Supremetoday AI"
Education Not A 'Service' Under Consumer Protection Act; Student's Complaint Against Institute Dismissed: Rajasthan State Consumer Commission
#ConsumerProtectionAct #EducationLaw #Jurisdiction
Education Not a 'Service'; Consumer Forums Can't Hear Fee & Admission Disputes: Rajasthan State Commission Jodhpur:The Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jodhpur Bench, has overturned a District Forum's order, ruling that educational institutions do not fall under the pur...
Property Owner Using Electricity Connection In Previous Owner's Name Not A ‘Consumer’ Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission
ConsumerProtectionAct ElectricityDispute TPDDL
Property Owner Not a 'Consumer' for Electricity Connection in Previous Owner's Name: Delhi State Commission Upholds Dismissal New Delhi:The Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, in a significant ruling, has held that an individual who owns and occupies a property cannot be consi...
No Proof, No Refund: UP Consumer Commission Holds Customer Must Prove Payment Beyond Booking Amount in Dealer Fraud Case
#ConsumerLaw #VicariousLiability #BurdenOfProof
UP Consumer Commission Limits Dealer's Liability to Proven Amount in Employee Fraud Case Bareilly, UP– The Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has modified a District Commission order, ruling that a vehicle dealership is only liable to refund the amount for which the cu...
Insurer Cannot Force 'Cash Loss' Settlement Without Insured's Consent; Must Settle Claim Based on Assessed Repair Cost: Rajasthan State Consumer Commission
ConsumerProtection InsuranceLaw MotorClaim
Insurer's Unilateral 'Cash Loss' Offer Rejected; Commission Upholds Repair Cost Award Udaipur, Rajasthan– The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has ruled that an insurance company cannot unilaterally impose a 'Cash Loss' settlement on an insured party without their consent. Upholdi...
Manufacturer Liable For Defective Product Even If Fault Is From Installation by Its Agent: State Consumer Commission
ConsumerProtection VicariousLiability DefectiveGoods
Manufacturer Cannot Escape Liability by Blaming Installer, State Consumer Commission Upholds Refund Order Jaipur, India– The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has ruled that a manufacturer is vicariously liable for the faults of its dealer/installer, holding that a consumer who pai...
Surveyor's Report Not Sacrosanct; Insurer Can't Escape Liability Without Proving Insured Caused Fire: Uttarakhand State Consumer Commission
InsuranceLaw ConsumerProtection Repudiation
Surveyor's Report Not Binding, Insurer Must Prove Insured's Fault for Fire: State Commission Orders Payout Dehradun, Uttarakhand– In a significant ruling reinforcing the rights of policyholders, the Uttarakhand State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has held that an insurance company ca...
Vehicle Manufacturer Liable For Manufacturing Defect Causing Tire Wear Despite Separate Tire Warranty: Rajasthan State Consumer Commission
#ConsumerProtection #ProductLiability #ManufacturingDefect
Rajasthan State Consumer Commission Holds Toyota Liable for Fortuner's Manufacturing Defect Causing Tire Wear Jodhpur:The Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has upheld a District Commission's order directing Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt Ltd to either rectify a manufacturing ...
Discom Can't Issue Exorbitant Bill Based on Unproven Tampering, Must Average Past Consumption for Faulty Meter: Rajasthan State Consumer Commission
#ConsumerProtection #ElectricityBill #DeficiencyInService
State Consumer Commission Orders JVVNL to Revise Exorbitant ₹3.2 Lakh Bill, Cites Lack of Evidence for Tampering Jaipur: The Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has provided significant relief to a consumer burdened with an exorbitant electricity bill, ruling that an electr...
Defective ASR Hip Implant: Manufacturer Liable for ₹10 Lakh Compensation, Surgeon Exonerated of Negligence: TN Consumer Commission
#MedicalNegligence #ConsumerProtection #ProductLiability
Manufacturer of Recalled ASR Hip Implant to Pay ₹10 Lakh for Patient's Suffering, Surgeon Exonerated CHENNAI:The Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has ordered Depuy Synthes, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, to pay ₹10 lakh in compensation to a patient who suffered due ...
Dealer and Manufacturer Jointly Liable for Faulty Vehicle; Refund is an Alternative to Repair and Fresh Warranty: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Commission
ConsumerProtection ProductLiability VehicleWarranty
State Consumer Commission Modifies Order, Makes Manufacturer and Dealer Jointly Liable for Faulty Scooter Raipur, Chhattisgarh– The Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has modified a District Commission order, holding both the vehicle dealer and the manufacturer jointly ...
