SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next

Defamation case against activist Medha Patkar

Activist Medha Patkar Convicted in Defamation Case Filed by Delhi LG V.K. Saxena - 2024-05-25

Subject : Criminal Law - Defamation

Activist Medha Patkar Convicted in Defamation Case Filed by Delhi LG V.K. Saxena
BY  Supreme Today News Desk,
Add Supreme Today News Desk on Google  news icon

Supreme Today News Desk

A Delhi court on Friday convicted Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader and activist Medha Patkar in a defamation case lodged against her by Delhi Lieutenant Governor V.K. Saxena . Metropolitan Magistrate Raghav Sharma found Ms. Patkar guilty of criminal defamation under the Indian Penal Code, which carries a maximum punishment of two years' imprisonment or a fine, or both.

The legal dispute between Patkar and Saxena dates back to 2000 when the activist filed a lawsuit against Saxena for publishing advertisements that were critical of her and the NBA. At the time, Saxena was the chief of the Ahmedabad-based NGO National Council for Civil Liberties. Saxena had also filed two separate cases against Patkar , alleging that she made defamatory comments about him during a television interview and issued a slanderous press statement.

In his 55-page judgment, the magistrate stated that reputation is one of the "most valuable assets a person can possess" and that Patkar 's statements calling Saxena "a coward, not a patriot, and alleging his involvement in hawala transactions" were not only defamatory but also crafted to incite negative perceptions. The court said Patkar 's actions were "deliberate and malicious, aimed at tarnishing the complainant's good name, and indeed caused substantial harm to his standing and credit in the eyes of the public."

The arguments on the quantum of sentence will be heard on May 30. This case is the latest in a long-running legal battle between the two parties, which has spanned over two decades.

Defamation - Reputation - Activist - Legal battle - Conviction - Punishment - Allegations - Tarnishing reputation - Public perception

#LegalNews #DefamationCase #ActivistConvicted

Breaking News

View All
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute

No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute

30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court

No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court

30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court

Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court

30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court

'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court

30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC

Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC

01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings

Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings

01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC

Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC

01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules

Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules

01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court

No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court

01 May 2026
SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Related Judgments

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon