Back
Transfers Minor's Due To Tutoring
In a significant order protecting the interests of a minor child, the has directed a temporary transfer of of a five-year-old girl from her mother to her father, observing that the child’s mental well-being was at risk due to parental interference. Justice Sandeep Jain, presiding over the matter, underscored the court’s role in preventing children from becoming "pawns" in bitter .
Background of the Conflict The dispute stems from a long-standing matrimonial conflict between the petitioner-father and the respondent-mother. In a previous petition (No. 699 of 2025), the court had granted the father through video conferencing. However, the father moved the court again, alleging that he was being denied meaningful access to his daughter and that the child had been inappropriately influenced by the mother.
The petitioner submitted that the minor had been "heavily tutored" by her mother to level grave, age-inappropriate accusations—including sexual abuse—against him.
The Court’s Interaction During the proceedings, Justice Sandeep Jain conducted a personal, sensitive interaction with the five-year-old child. While the girl expressed a desire not to live with her father and repeated allegations of assault and sexual abuse, the court found these statements to be discordant with the child's developmental age.
The Court concluded that the specific manner in which the child recounted these allegations was beyond her intellectual capacity, pointing squarely to coaching by the custodial parent.
Key Observations The court expressed deep concern regarding the impact of this behavior on the child’s future. In his observations, Justice Sandeep Jain noted:
-
"It is very much apparent that given the tender age of the , she should not be used as a pawn in the fight between the husband and wife, but the respondent has used her as a pawn."
-
"After having interaction with the , this Court is of the opinion that a lot of negative things have been tutored to the and it is not good for her welfare if she remains with the respondent no.4."
-
"It is apparent that the has been heavily tutored by her mother; as such, no reliance can be placed on her submission that she was sexually abused by her father."
The Verdict and Future Directions Prioritizing the welfare of the child, the court ordered that the of the minor be temporarily transferred to the father until the next date of hearing. To ensure a balanced approach, the court has permitted the mother to visit the father’s residence to meet the child, and has mandated that the father facilitate video-conferencing access for the mother.
The and have been directed to ensure the safety of both the father and the child during the transition. The matter is currently listed for further hearing on , where the petitioner has been ordered to present the child before the court.
This ruling serves as a stern reminder to parties in that the court will not tolerate the manipulation or "tutoring" of children, which threatens to cause irreparable psychological harm and interferes with the moral and social development of the minor.
