Andhra Pradesh High Court hears Shaik Shahina criminal revision case against State - 2026-07-06

Andhra Pradesh High Court hears Shaik Shahina criminal revision case against State

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh has before it a criminal revision petition, registered as CRLRC 655 of 2026, in which Shaik Shahina has moved against the State of Andhra Pradesh. The matter is listed before Justice Y. Lakshmana Rao.

A Criminal Challenge Reaches the High Court

Criminal revision proceedings serve as a vital avenue for parties seeking correction of orders passed by subordinate criminal courts. In this instance, Shaik Shahina, the petitioner, has invoked the revisional jurisdiction of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh to challenge proceedings or an order arising from a criminal matter involving the State.

The case, bearing number CRLRC 655/2026, falls squarely within the High Court's supervisory and corrective jurisdiction over criminal matters emanating from courts below.

Parties Before the Bench

• Petitioner: Shaik Shahina, who has filed the revision petition
• Respondent: The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented through its prosecuting machinery
• Presiding Judge: Justice Y. Lakshmana Rao of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh

Understanding Criminal Revision Jurisdiction

Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, a High Court exercises revisional powers to examine the legality, correctness, or propriety of any order passed by an inferior criminal court. This jurisdiction also allows the High Court to scrutinise the regularity of proceedings before such courts.

A criminal revision is not a full appeal; it is a narrower corrective remedy. The High Court typically intervenes where there is a patent error of law, a jurisdictional defect, or a grave miscarriage of justice that warrants interference. The petitioner must demonstrate that the lower court's order suffers from such infirmities.

What Lies Ahead

As the revision petition proceeds, the court will examine the grounds raised by Shaik Shahina and the response of the State. The petitioner's submissions will centre on why the impugned order or proceedings ought to be set aside or modified, while the State will defend the legality of the actions taken.

Criminal revision matters of this nature underscore the important role of the High Court as a guardian of fairness and legality in the criminal justice system. The adjudication of CRLRC 655/2026 will rest on the specific facts and legal submissions presented before Justice Y. Lakshmana Rao.

The proceedings remain ongoing, and the final outcome will be determined based on the merits of the case as argued before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh.