Movie Ban
Subject : Entertainment
AP High Court Stays Screening of 'Rajadhani Files' Movie
Pronouncing a set of interim orders, the court directed that all the records pertaining to the movie be placed before it.
The APHC will continue the hearing of the case on Friday and will pronounce the judgment.
The Rajdhani Files was released in theatres on Thursday, but the theatres abruptly stopped screening the movie due to the HC orders.
Prashant, argued that the characters in the movie resembled CM Jagan Mohan Reddy and former minister Kodali Sri Venkateswara Rao alias Nani.
Muralidhar Rao, representing the movie’s producers, informed the court that the film was not intended to malign anyone.
“The producers had agreed to the revision committee's suggestions after the censor board recommended the deletion of some scenes. Pronouncing a set of interim orders, the court directed that all the records pertaining to the movie be placed before it. The APHC will continue the hearing of the case on Friday and will pronounce the judgment.
The Rajdhani Files was released in theatres on Thursday, but the theatres abruptly stopped screening the movie due to the HC orders. This angered spectators in several places.
Amaravati farmers came to watch the movie in a theatre at Undavalli of Amaravati but the management stopped the movie in the middle due to the APHC orders. The disappointed farmers and Telugu Desam activists staged a protest for some time at the theatre.
A similar protest took place at a theatre in Vijayawada too.
According to the reports, the Rajdhani Files film aims to shed light on the YSRC government’s proposal to establish three capitals in AP.
The high court had earlier reserved its orders on a stay petition filed by YSRC MLC and party general secretary Lella Appi Reddy.
Justice N. Jayasurya reserved his order on the petition challenging the censor certificate issued to the movie.
Appi Reddy’s counsel, V.R.N. Prashant, argued that the characters in the movie resembled CM Jagan Mohan Reddy and former minister Kodali Sri Venkateswara Rao alias Nani. Even the names given to the characters were similar to those of the CM and the ex-minister, he stated.
The petitioner alleged that the movie is being released just before the elections to malign the present government and the CM. “Certain scenes in the film are defamatory to Jagan Reddy and these misled people by distorting facts.” The trailer of the film was released on February 5.
The petitioner's counsel argued that the chief minister and the government were portrayed negatively for “selfish political reasons.”
Asserting that freedom of expression has its limits, he argued that the filmmakers had crossed that line to defame the ruling party ahead of the upcoming elections.
The petitioner's counsel also contended that since the issue of capital cities is sub-judice, making a film on the same topic is inappropriate.
U. Muralidhar Rao, representing the movie’s producers, informed the court that the film was not intended to malign anyone. “The producers had agreed to the revision committee's suggestions after the censor board recommended the deletion of some scenes. The censor certificate was issued after certain scenes were removed based on the revision committee's recommendations.”
Written and directed by Bhanu, Rajdhani Files features new actors Akilan and Veena in the lead roles.
Kantamaneni Ravi Shankar, who contested as a TD rebel candidate from the Avanigadda constituency in the 2019 elections, produced the movie.
Movie Ban - Defamation - Freedom of Expression - Political Influence - Censor Board - Election Interference
#RajadhaniFiles #APHighCourt #MovieBan
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Ex-Parte Order Without Notice or Jurisdiction Constitutes 'Gross Abuse of Process': Rajasthan High Court
15 Jun 2026
Mandatory Administrative Enquiry Precedes FIR Against Public Servants Under SC/ST Act: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Assigning Administrative Charges to Tainted Officials Violates Natural Justice: MP High Court Quashes PWD Order
16 Jun 2026
Outsourced Employees Lack Right to Promotion; Unauthorized Designation Upgrades Are Legally Void: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Calcutta HC Questions Speaker’s Power to Appoint LoP
16 Jun 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.