Bombay High Court Directs Harichand Nagpal to Deposit One Crore Thirty Two Lakh Nova Breach

In a stern response to continued non-compliance, the Bombay High Court has directed trader Harichand Nagpal to deposit a total of Rs. 1.32 crore for breaching a trademark injunction protecting the NOVA trademark. The order came from a Division Bench of Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata on September 1, 2026.

From Injunction to Escalating Costs

The dispute stems from a trademark infringement case where Dr. Ashok M. Bhat holds the rights to the NOVA trademark. A Single Judge of the High Court had earlier, on July 13, 2026, imposed costs of Rs. 82,42,868 on Nagpal for violating an injunction order. Nagpal appealed the order, but the Division Bench noted that he had not complied with the directions of the Single Judge’s order.

“Record clearly indicates that, directions issued vide impugned Order dated 13th July 2026, have also not been complied with by the Appellant till today,” the Bench observed.

Additional Costs Accepted

Faced with the non-compliance, the appellant’s counsel, on instructions from Nagpal’s son, offered to deposit an additional Rs. 50,00,000 over and above the original costs. The Bench accepted the statement and directed Nagpal to deposit the entire amount of Rs. 1,32,42,868 in the Registry of the Court within one week.

“In view thereof, learned counsel for Appellant on instructions from the son of the Appellant submitted that, in addition to the cost of Rs. 82,42,868/- imposed by the learned Single Judge by the impugned Order dated 13th July 2026, he will deposit an additional cost of Rs. 50,00,000/- in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today. The said statement is accepted.”

Implications and Next Steps

The order underscores the High Court’s firm approach towards enforcing compliance with injunctive orders in intellectual property matters. By requiring the full amount to be deposited before the next hearing, the court has ensured that the costs order is not further delayed.

The matter is now listed for September 16, 2026, when the court will likely consider the next steps in the appeal.