Bombay High Court Slams Maharashtra's Appalling Apathy: 228 Students Walk 30 Km Through Tiger Reserve

A Walk Through Danger: 228 Students at Risk Daily

Each morning, scores of schoolchildren in the Sahyadri Tiger Reserve (STR) region set out on a treacherous journey: walking up to 30 kilometres through forest corridors frequented by tigers, leopards, and Indian gaurs. For many, the round trip consumes four hours—time spent not learning, but navigating an active hunting ground. This harrowing reality prompted the Bombay High Court to issue strong directives on April 2, 2026, ordering authorities to identify schools vulnerable to wildlife attacks and deploy safe transport escorted by Rapid Response Teams (RRTs). Yet, when the matter came up for hearing on August 19, the bench of Justice Sharmila Deshmukh and Justice Neeraj Dhote found that absolutely nothing had been done .

'Appalling Apathy': Court Slams Authorities for Ignoring Orders

The court did not mince words. "Despite the order having been passed on 2nd April 2026, absolutely nothing has been done by the District Collector and the Forest Department to identify the dangerous schools or to deploy safe school transport for the school children escorted by a dedicated RRT," the bench recorded. An additional affidavit from the petitioner revealed that 228 students from eight villages in Sangli district travel to five schools, facing continuous exposure to wildlife attacks. The maximum distance travelled by a child is 30 kilometres for sixth standard, with no transport facility available.

"The apathy of the State Government is appalling. There is absolutely no concern for the safety of the children as not even the minimum transport facilities are made available for the students," the judges observed.

A Crisis with a Human Cost

The danger is not hypothetical. Since 2014, the STR area—home to five tigers, around 50 leopards, and over 100 Indian gaurs—has recorded 30 wildlife attacks, resulting in five deaths, including two schoolchildren. Five attacks were reported in 2025 alone, and two fatalities have occurred since the April order, underscoring the urgency. The petitioner, Harish Kamble, also highlighted that fear of attacks has left over 1,000 acres of fertile farmland uncultivated and exposed more than 500 students to daily risks.

In a letter to the court, the headmaster of Hutatma Nanak Singh Secondary and Higher Secondary School in Sonawade detailed the challenges students face because of the persistent human-wildlife conflict.

Statutory Obligations Ignored: RTE Rules and Wildlife Protection Act

The court's April order was grounded in clear legal mandates. Rule 6 of the Right to Education (RTE) Rules imposes a statutory duty on the state to secure children's access to schools. Additionally, Section 38V of the Wildlife Protection Act, read with Article 21 of the Constitution, places a twin obligation on the government: to protect wildlife, and to protect citizens from that wildlife. The failure to deploy a single Advanced Life Support (ALS) ambulance at the Shittur-Warun primary centre, as directed, was a further breach of these duties.

"We cannot countenance such a conduct on behalf of the District Collector and the Forest Department ," the bench declared, noting that no affidavit of compliance had been filed by either the District Collector or the Forest Department .

Court Warns of Serious Consequences

The bench directed the District Collector and the Forest Department to file affidavits within one week, submitting an explanation for the non-compliance . "We make it clear that if we are not satisfied with the explanation, we will be constrained to take a very serious view of the matter," the court warned. The matter has been placed for further hearing on August 25, 2026 .

The Human Face of the Verdict

Beyond the legal rebuke, the order shines a spotlight on the daily ordeal of children like the 11-year-old walking 30 kilometres through tiger territory simply to attend sixth grade. The court's intervention demands not just compliance, but a fundamental rethinking of how the state balances wildlife conservation with the safety of its most vulnerable citizens. As the August 25 deadline approaches, all eyes are on the authorities to show whether they will treat the safety of 228 children with the urgency it deserves.