BRICS Summit Clash Forces GST Council to Reschedule 57th Meeting to October 7

The 57th meeting of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council, originally scheduled for 12 September 2026, has been postponed to 7 October 2026 due to a scheduling conflict with the BRICS Leaders' Summit hosted by India in New Delhi on 12–13 September. The rescheduling, confirmed by reliable sources within the finance ministry, moves the crucial Centre-state tax policy discussion to next month, with an agenda that remains focused on easing compliance burdens and resolving long-pending technical issues under the GST regime.

The overlap with the high-level international gathering raised logistical concerns because of the substantial administrative and security arrangements required for the BRICS Summit across the national capital. Preparatory meetings of GST officers have now been scheduled for 5 and 6 October, ahead of the Council meeting on 7 October. An official notification confirming the new date is expected to be issued shortly, with Delhi remaining the venue.

Background: GST 2.0 and the Council's Mandate

This will be the first meeting of the GST Council since the landmark overhaul of the tax structure in September 2025, commonly referred to as GST 2.0 reforms. In its previous meeting on 3 September 2025, the Council rationalized the GST slab system from four to three primary rates: 5 per cent, 18 per cent, and a special 40 per cent rate for a limited set of demerit and luxury goods (replacing the earlier 28 per cent slab plus compensation cess). Those rates took effect on 22 September 2025.

Under Regulation 6 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the GST Council, 2016, the Council is required to convene at least once every quarter of the financial year. The gap between the September 2025 meeting and the now-rescheduled October 2026 meeting—over 13 months—highlights the irregularity of Council convenings, a fact that may draw scrutiny from legal and compliance professionals monitoring the body's adherence to its own procedural rules.

Officers' Meetings and Procedural Updates

The preparatory meetings of government officers for the GST meeting will now take place on 5 October at 3:00 p.m. and on 6 October at 11:00 a.m., prior to the Council meeting on 7 October. These officer-level discussions are critical for finalizing the draft agenda and technical recommendations that inform the Council's decision-making. According to an office memorandum sent to Council members, the officers will deliberate on pending items related to input tax credit (ITC), refunds, and compliance procedures.

Legal professionals should note that the original schedule—an officers' meeting on 11 September followed by the Council on 12 September—was upended by the BRICS Summit, which required the same government infrastructure (including venue security and minister availability). The reschedule ensures that both events receive adequate administrative attention without compromising the quality of deliberation.

Key Agenda Items: ITC, Inverted Duty Structure, and Compliance

The October meeting is expected to tackle several high-priority issues that have weighed on businesses since the GST 2.0 rollout. Chief among these are proposals to ease restrictions on input tax credit claims. One significant proposal before the Council seeks to protect buyers from losing ITC if their suppliers fail to deposit taxes with the government. Under the proposed mechanism, a buyer could retain the ITC upon demonstrating that payment—including the GST component—was made through banking channels or other prescribed documents. This change would reduce the risk of cascading tax liability for honest purchasers.

Another long-standing concern is the problem of accumulated input tax credits arising from the inverted duty structure—a scenario where the tax rate on inputs is higher than that on outputs, leading to unutilized credits. The Council may consider measures to allow refunds of such accumulated credits more smoothly, relieving working capital pressure on businesses in sectors like textiles, footwear, and certain consumer goods.

Additionally, the Council is expected to examine proposals to allow companies to claim ITC on vehicles purchased for employee use and on group health and life insurance policies bought for employees. These proposals, part of the ease-of-doing-business review by a committee of officers, aim to align the GST treatment with actual business expenditure patterns.

Registration and Corporate Guarantee Issues

Simplifying GST registration for small businesses is also on the table. Reports indicate that the Council may consider permitting businesses to obtain GST registrations in multiple states, which could streamline compliance for enterprises operating across state borders. Currently, the requirement of a separate registration in each state imposes significant administrative costs, particularly for e-commerce operators and service providers.

Another agenda item likely to generate interest is the GST treatment of corporate guarantees provided within a group. Businesses have sought greater clarity and a simpler approach to the valuation and taxation of such arrangements, which have been a source of litigation and uncertainty. The Council may adopt a more transparent rule, potentially moving away from the current ad hoc valuation approach.

Legal Implications for Practitioners and Businesses

For tax practitioners, the rescheduled meeting signals an important opportunity to secure clarity on critical compliance issues that have been in limbo since the GST 2.0 reforms. The proposed changes to ITC rules—especially the buyer protection mechanism—could significantly alter the risk profile of credit transactions. Lawyers counseling clients on supply chain structuring will need to track these developments closely.

The inverted duty structure reform, if implemented, would directly affect industries where credit accumulation is most acute. Legal professionals representing businesses in the pharmaceutical, textile, and automobile sectors should prepare to analyze the draft proposals once they are released after the officers' meeting.

Moreover, the Council’s failure to meet quarterly for over a year may raise questions about the enforceability of the mandatory meeting requirement. Although the rules provide no explicit penalty for non-compliance, the delay could be cited by litigants in pending GST disputes to argue that the Council has not been functioning in accordance with its own procedural framework.

Conclusion

The postponement of the 57th GST Council meeting, while driven by logistical necessity, does not dilute the importance of the agenda. With the BRICS Summit occupying the government's attention, the shift to 7 October gives both the Council and its supporting officers additional time to fine-tune the proposals. For legal professionals monitoring India’s indirect tax landscape, the outcomes of this meeting will be pivotal in defining the trajectory of GST administration for the remainder of the financial year. As the date approaches, all eyes will be on the officer-level recommendations and the final agenda circulated by the Ministry of Finance.