Calcutta High Court Orders Inspector General of Correctional Services to Compensate Heirs of Deceased Inmates

In a significant move to address the plight of families who lost loved ones in custody, the Calcutta High Court has directed the Inspector General of Correctional Services, West Bengal, to immediately disburse compensation to the heirs and legal representatives of inmates who died unnatural deaths in correctional homes. The Division Bench of Justice Debangsu Basak and Justice Aryak Dutt issued the directive on September 28, 2026, while hearing a batch of public interest litigations concerning conditions in state prisons.

A Mechanism for Justice

The court’s order builds on its earlier direction of July 15, 2026, which set up a modality for identifying the heirs of deceased inmates. At that time, the State had expressed its inability to disburse compensation due to a lack of material particulars about the legal representatives of many deceased prisoners. To bridge this gap, the court requested the Member Secretary of the State Legal Services Authority (SLSA) to conduct a comprehensive identification exercise through all District Legal Services Authorities.

The 2019 Scheme Takes Center Stage

During the proceedings, the SLSA informed the court about the existence of the West Bengal Correctional Services Prisoners (Unnatural Death Compensation) Scheme, 2019 . Under Regulation 3(3) of this scheme, the fund created for compensation is operated by the Inspector General of Correctional Services. The court therefore directed:

"the Inspector of General of Correctional Services will proceed to disburse compensation in terms of such scheme to the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased inmates of the correctional homes."

The court further clarified that the Inspector General must act on the data provided by the SLSA. If the data is deemed insufficient for disbursement in any particular case, a reasoned order must be passed for each deceased inmate and communicated to the SLSA. Where the data is sufficient, disbursement must be made expeditiously.

Expanding the Identification Drive

The SLSA’s report, taken on record on September 10, 2026, covered deaths only from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021, and revealed that several heirs remained unidentified. The court has now directed the SLSA to extend the identification exercise to all inmates who died from January 1, 2022, onwards and to continue updating the data periodically. The State has been ordered to provide the SLSA with the complete list of deaths in custody from 2022 to date and to keep updating it.

Monitoring Open Prisons and Supreme Court Directives

The court also took note of the Supreme Court’s judgment in Suhas Chakma vs. Union of India & Ors. (February 26, 2026), which mandated the constitution of Monitoring Committees for Open Correctional Institutions (OCIs) in every state and union territory. The High Court administration informed the bench that such a committee has already been constituted in West Bengal. The court directed that status reports be submitted quarterly, with the first consolidated annual report to the Supreme Court due by March 31, 2027.

Rejecting Segregation, Allowing Further Input

The learned Amicus Curiae sought segregation of three writ petitions for separate hearing, arguing they dealt with inhuman conditions in correctional homes. The bench declined the request, observing that all the petitions sought ameliorative measures and that segregation could lead to duplication of efforts and conflicting decisions. However, the Amicus Curiae was given liberty to place additional material on record regarding the alleged continuation of inhuman conditions.

The matter has been listed for further hearing after two weeks, with the court expected to monitor compliance with its directions closely.