Hit-and-Run
Subject : Legal - Criminal Law
Chiefs' Rashee Rice Admits Driving Lamborghini in Dallas Hit-and-Run
Kansas City Chiefs wide receiver Rashee Rice was driving the Lamborghini involved in a hit-and-run crash in Dallas last Saturday, his attorney said at a news conference Thursday.
Royce West, Rice's attorney, added that the wideout admitted to being behind the wheel at the time of the crash during an interview with the police.
Officers are still investigating why Rice left the scene and the wideout is "fully cooperating," West said.
Rice's representation has yet to communicate with the Chiefs in any capacity because facts are still unclear, per West.
The crash also reportedly left a 27-year-old and her 4-year-old son with an "un-drivable" Hyundai Accent.
West emphasized on Monday that Rice will take responsibility for making things right with the victims.
"Mr. Rice wants to make certain that it's understood and appreciated that he's going to do everything in his power to bring their life back to as normal as possible, in terms of injuries, in terms of property damage," West said. "And make certain that he is responsible for helping them to get through that particular part of this. Don't get us wrong, we understand that no one can help [the victims] get over the memories of being in an accident."
Rice released a statement Monday, apologizing for his role in the pile-up without specifying what he was responsible for.
"Today I met with
Rice, 23, was a second-round draft pick by the Chiefs in 2023 out of Southern Methodist University. He recorded 79 receptions for 938 yards with seven touchdowns last season.
West answered multiple questions from reporters during the news conference. At one point, the attorney seemed to take issue with the line of questioning focusing on the accident instead of Rice's character and career accomplishments.
Hit-and-run - Lamborghini - Dallas - Chiefs - Wide receiver - Accident - Investigation - Charges - Responsibility - Apology
#NFL #HitAndRun #LegalTrouble
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.