Court Denies Bail to IAS Officer Gyanendra Gangwar in KPSC Veterinary Officer Recruitment Scam

Bengaluru's LI Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge Smt. Nirmala Devi S. on Friday rejected the regular bail petition of suspended IAS officer Gyanendra Kumar Gangwar, arraigned as Accused No. 5 in the alleged Karnataka Public Service Commission (KPSC) Veterinary Officer recruitment scam. The court observed that the prosecution had placed prima facie material establishing a money trail and contact between Gangwar and co-accused Basavaraj Kannale, and that the investigation was at a crucial stage.

A Recruitment Process Under Scrutiny

The case stems from KPSC's notification dated 29 July 2024 for recruiting 400 Veterinary Officers. Competitive examinations were held on 8 and 9 January 2026 , with the final merit list published on 17 July 2026 . Suspicion arose when several candidates linked to KPSC officials secured unusually high marks, while meritorious aspirants — including gold medalists and those who cleared the UPSC examinations — failed to secure even 350 marks. Allegations included question paper leaks, training of candidates at hotels and resorts, and distribution of pre-answered OMR sheets. The FIR, registered as Crime No. 89/2026 by the Vidhana Soudha police and now investigated by the CID , invokes Section 318(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 , and Section 10 of the Karnataka Public Examination (Measures for Prevention of Corruption and Unfair Means of Recruitment) Act, 2023 .

Arguments and Counter-Arguments

Gangwar, a former Controller of Examination at KPSC, contended that he voluntarily appeared before the investigating agency on 27, 28, and 29 August 2026 pursuant to notice under Section 179 BNSS . He claimed he was abruptly arrested on 29 August and taken into police custody until 9 September, after which he remained in judicial custody . His counsel argued that the case was based entirely on documentary and electronic evidence already seized and sent for forensic analysis , leaving no scope for tampering . The defense also raised serious health concerns: Gangwar is a testicular cancer survivor, has undergone two surgeries, and suffers from hypertension, asthma, chronic liver condition, and severe lumbar spinal degeneration requiring immediate surgery.

The prosecution, led by Public Prosecutor, strongly opposed the bail. It was argued that Gangwar, as a senior IAS officer, could influence witnesses and destroy evidence. The CID presented a detailed money trail : candidates deposited over ₹70 lakh into accounts of Om Lakshmi Souharda Cooperative Society , from which funds were transferred to Bhima Jewellers for gold jewellery purchases amounting to ₹52.30 lakh — allegedly purchased in the name of Gangwar's associate Ms. Yashi Jaiswal. The prosecution also produced IPDR extracts showing frequent phone contact between Gangwar and Kannale, and records of 54 flight bookings in Gangwar's name and 11 in Ms. Jaiswal's name, totaling ₹11.37 lakh, allegedly paid by Kannale through his enterprise, Bhagawathi Enterprises .

Court's Reasoning: Prima Facie Case and Tampering Risk

After hearing both sides, the court meticulously examined the evidence. It observed that the prosecution had made out a prima facie case against Gangwar, particularly regarding the money trail linking him to Kannale and the candidates. The judgment notes:

"The prosecution has made-out a prima facie case regarding the alleged offence against the petitioner... if he is released on bail, as he is an IAS Officer there is possibility of influencing further investigation."

The court also took note of the allegation that a Xiaomi tablet used in the offence had been destroyed, and that the investigation into statements of candidates and witnesses was still pending. Relying on precedents such as Subramanian Swamy v. Manmohan Singh and Niranjan Hemchandra Satittal v. State of Maharashtra , the court emphasized that the gravity of the offence and the stage of investigation warranted denial of bail.

Medical Grounds Insufficient

The defense's plea for bail on medical grounds was also turned down. The court noted that despite claims of serious conditions requiring immediate spinal surgery, no medical records were placed on record. It stated:

"The petitioner has failed to establish that he is suffering from serious medical condition and requires medication and immediate surgery i.e., medical emergency . Hence the said ground is not established."

Final Order

In a detailed order dated 25 September 2026 , Judge Nirmala Devi S. concluded that Gangwar had not made out valid grounds for regular bail . Rejecting the petition under Section 483 BNSS , the court directed that the IAS officer remain in judicial custody as the investigation continues. The development adds to mounting scrutiny of the KPSC recruitment process, with the Karnataka High Court having already constituted a Special Investigation Team led by senior IPS officer Alok Kumar to probe the irregularities.