Back
Designates 85 Advocates as Following Rigorous Review Process
In a significant move toward restoring confidence in its internal selection procedures, the has announced the designation of 85 advocates as ''. The announcement, made on , via a notification from the Registrar General, follows a comprehensive assessment process conducted by a reconstituted .
A Departure from Controversy The current round of designations arrives on the heels of significant legal turbulence experienced in . During that period, the High Court’s process for elevating was marred by allegations of a lack of transparency and procedural irregularity. The controversy culminated in the resignation of senior advocate from the , which eventually triggered a intervention.
In , the directed the to re-examine the deferred and rejected applications in light of the High Court rules. This judicial nudge prompted the establishment of a reformed committee, chaired by Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and supported by senior judges and representatives of the Bar, including and former .
The New Benchmark: One-on-One Assessment This year’s process marked a sharp deviation from the group-interview format of the past. Applicants described the interviews as a "pleasant change," characterized by rigorous, one-on-one sessions spanning between five and 15 minutes. Unlike the previous, often perfunctory oral interactions, these sessions probed candidate knowledge on core principles of law and procedural logic.
"The interviews were interactive, with questions being asked on principles of law. It is a first, and it is a welcome change… It also helps the judges know what kind of people they are designating,"
remarked one candidate who participated in the process.
Key Observations The commitment to a more deliberative process appears to be the hallmark of these appointments:
-
On Process Integrity:
"The reconstituted considered the applications of the 232 advocates deferred or rejected in , and, this time, conducted interviews markedly different in character."
- On Intellectual Rigor: The committee prioritized questions that "required logical thinking," moving away from the superficial assessments that previously drew criticism from the .
- On Representation: The final list of 85 designates includes 10 women, reflecting an increasingly balanced representation within the senior ranks of the .
The Road Ahead The newly designated represent a broad spectrum of practice areas, including , , and . By ensuring that the designation follows a transparent, merit-based interview protocol directed by the ’s oversight, the has effectively reset the standard for professional advancement within its jurisdiction.
As these 85 practitioners transition into their new roles, the legal community observes a renewed emphasis on meritocracy. The impact of this restored is expected to be felt in subsequent lists, as the High Court continues to refine the balance between domain expertise and judicial evaluation.
