SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next

Personality and Publicity Rights

Delhi HC Grants Dynamic+ Injunction to Protect Personality Rights Against AI-Driven Impersonation: CS(COMM) 578/2025 - 2026-05-24

Subject : Civil Law - Intellectual Property Rights

Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
Delhi HC Grants Dynamic+ Injunction to Protect Personality Rights Against AI-Driven Impersonation: CS(COMM) 578/2025

Supreme Today News Desk

Battling the 'Hydra': Delhi High Court Grants Landmark Protection Against AI Deepfakes

In a decisive move to curb the rampant exploitation of digital identity, the High Court of Delhi has granted a ‘dynamic+’ injunction in favor of globally renowned spiritual leader Sadhguru Jagadish Vasudev and the Isha Foundation. The ruling comes as a landmark judgment against the rising tide of AI-powered celebrity impersonation and online scams.

The Case: When AI Attacks Identity

The plaintiffs, Sadhguru and the Isha Foundation, approached the court seeking protection against a cluster of "rogue websites" and social media accounts. The defendants had allegedly been using advanced Artificial Intelligence tools to create and distribute "deepfake" content—doctored videos, audio, and images that mimicked the spiritual leader’s likeness, voice, and distinctive persona to promote investment scams, fake books, and unverified commercial products.

The core legal struggle centered on the unauthorized misappropriation of personality and publicity rights, where the plaintiffs argued that the defendants were peddling misinformation under the guise of an authentic association, thereby causing irreparable harm to public trust.

Arguments of the Plaintiffs

The primary counsel for the plaintiffs underscored that the damage was not merely financial but foundational, undermining the reputation built over decades of humanitarian and spiritual service. The defendants’ modus operandi involved "hydra-headed" tactics: as soon as one infringing URL was taken down, others emerged with minor alphanumeric variations, making standard relief ineffective.

By arraying entities like the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) and the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MEITY) as respondents, the plaintiffs aimed to ensure a systemic mechanism to block these elusive platforms in real-time.

The Court’s Reasoning

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee recognized the urgent necessity to evolve judicial remedies alongside technology. Acknowledging that the rights of a public figure cannot be "rendered otiose" by technological abuse, the Court emphasized the role of a 'dynamic+ injunction'—a modern tool that allows plaintiffs to seek takedowns for future infringing content without needing to initiate fresh litigation for every single violation.

Key Observations

Highlighting the gravity of the situation, the bench noted:

> "If allowed to continue in the manner it will soon spread like a pandemic with wide uncontrollable repercussions, especially, since it is a social media platform(s) herein happen to be the internet portal(s). If not stopped, the chances that (wrong) message will spread like wild fire with hardly any water left to douse it."

Addressing the deceptive nature of the infringing websites, the Court remarked:

> "This so-called dangerous edge has become even sharper with the fast-paced evolution of certain ‘hydra-headed’ websites, which, even if blocked/deleted, have the incredible potential to resurface in multitudes as alphanumeric or mirror websites."

The Court stressed that the protection of personality rights is a critical societal concern:

> "The right... cannot be rendered otiose in this world of rapidly developing technology and for that, enforcement of intellectual property rights on any social platform... ought to be visible and effective."

A New Frontier for Digital Justice

The final order mandates that the identified defendants cease all unauthorized use of the plaintiffs’ likeness and persona. Crucially, the Court directed the relevant authorities (DoT/MEITY) and social media platforms to implement an agile takedown mechanism for any content that the plaintiffs can identify as infringing in the future.

This judgment serves as a stern warning to those utilizing AI as a weapon for fraud. By streamlining the enforcement process, the Delhi High Court has set a powerful precedent, ensuring that the protection of an individual's image—a fundamental facet of personal identity—remains enforceable even in the chaotic, borderless landscape of the internet.

AI-generated content - Deepfakes - Digital identity - Online fraud - Publicity rights - Intellectual property

#PersonalityRights #DynamicInjunction

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top