Personality and Publicity Rights
Subject : Civil Law - Intellectual Property Rights
In a decisive move to curb the rampant exploitation of digital identity, the High Court of Delhi has granted a ‘dynamic+’ injunction in favor of globally renowned spiritual leader Sadhguru Jagadish Vasudev and the Isha Foundation. The ruling comes as a landmark judgment against the rising tide of AI-powered celebrity impersonation and online scams.
The plaintiffs, Sadhguru and the Isha Foundation, approached the court seeking protection against a cluster of "rogue websites" and social media accounts. The defendants had allegedly been using advanced Artificial Intelligence tools to create and distribute "deepfake" content—doctored videos, audio, and images that mimicked the spiritual leader’s likeness, voice, and distinctive persona to promote investment scams, fake books, and unverified commercial products.
The core legal struggle centered on the unauthorized misappropriation of personality and publicity rights, where the plaintiffs argued that the defendants were peddling misinformation under the guise of an authentic association, thereby causing irreparable harm to public trust.
The primary counsel for the plaintiffs underscored that the damage was not merely financial but foundational, undermining the reputation built over decades of humanitarian and spiritual service. The defendants’ modus operandi involved "hydra-headed" tactics: as soon as one infringing URL was taken down, others emerged with minor alphanumeric variations, making standard relief ineffective.
By arraying entities like the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) and the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MEITY) as respondents, the plaintiffs aimed to ensure a systemic mechanism to block these elusive platforms in real-time.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee recognized the urgent necessity to evolve judicial remedies alongside technology. Acknowledging that the rights of a public figure cannot be "rendered otiose" by technological abuse, the Court emphasized the role of a 'dynamic+ injunction'—a modern tool that allows plaintiffs to seek takedowns for future infringing content without needing to initiate fresh litigation for every single violation.
Highlighting the gravity of the situation, the bench noted:
> "If allowed to continue in the manner it will soon spread like a pandemic with wide uncontrollable repercussions, especially, since it is a social media platform(s) herein happen to be the internet portal(s). If not stopped, the chances that (wrong) message will spread like wild fire with hardly any water left to douse it."
Addressing the deceptive nature of the infringing websites, the Court remarked:
> "This so-called dangerous edge has become even sharper with the fast-paced evolution of certain ‘hydra-headed’ websites, which, even if blocked/deleted, have the incredible potential to resurface in multitudes as alphanumeric or mirror websites."
The Court stressed that the protection of personality rights is a critical societal concern:
> "The right... cannot be rendered otiose in this world of rapidly developing technology and for that, enforcement of intellectual property rights on any social platform... ought to be visible and effective."
The final order mandates that the identified defendants cease all unauthorized use of the plaintiffs’ likeness and persona. Crucially, the Court directed the relevant authorities (DoT/MEITY) and social media platforms to implement an agile takedown mechanism for any content that the plaintiffs can identify as infringing in the future.
This judgment serves as a stern warning to those utilizing AI as a weapon for fraud. By streamlining the enforcement process, the Delhi High Court has set a powerful precedent, ensuring that the protection of an individual's image—a fundamental facet of personal identity—remains enforceable even in the chaotic, borderless landscape of the internet.
View the social posts created for this story.
AI-generated content - Deepfakes - Digital identity - Online fraud - Publicity rights - Intellectual property
#PersonalityRights #DynamicInjunction
Salman Khan Files Delhi HC Plea Against 'Kala Hiran'
12 Jun 2026
Writ Court Cannot Exercise Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Relief After Directing Litigant to Civil Forum: MP High Court
12 Jun 2026
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Ex-Parte Order Without Notice or Jurisdiction Constitutes 'Gross Abuse of Process': Rajasthan High Court
15 Jun 2026
Mandatory Administrative Enquiry Precedes FIR Against Public Servants Under SC/ST Act: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Assigning Administrative Charges to Tainted Officials Violates Natural Justice: MP High Court Quashes PWD Order
16 Jun 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.