Personality and Publicity Rights
Subject : Civil Law - Intellectual Property Rights
In a decisive move to curb the rampant exploitation of digital identity, the High Court of Delhi has granted a ‘dynamic+’ injunction in favor of globally renowned spiritual leader Sadhguru Jagadish Vasudev and the Isha Foundation. The ruling comes as a landmark judgment against the rising tide of AI-powered celebrity impersonation and online scams.
The plaintiffs, Sadhguru and the Isha Foundation, approached the court seeking protection against a cluster of "rogue websites" and social media accounts. The defendants had allegedly been using advanced Artificial Intelligence tools to create and distribute "deepfake" content—doctored videos, audio, and images that mimicked the spiritual leader’s likeness, voice, and distinctive persona to promote investment scams, fake books, and unverified commercial products.
The core legal struggle centered on the unauthorized misappropriation of personality and publicity rights, where the plaintiffs argued that the defendants were peddling misinformation under the guise of an authentic association, thereby causing irreparable harm to public trust.
The primary counsel for the plaintiffs underscored that the damage was not merely financial but foundational, undermining the reputation built over decades of humanitarian and spiritual service. The defendants’ modus operandi involved "hydra-headed" tactics: as soon as one infringing URL was taken down, others emerged with minor alphanumeric variations, making standard relief ineffective.
By arraying entities like the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) and the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MEITY) as respondents, the plaintiffs aimed to ensure a systemic mechanism to block these elusive platforms in real-time.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee recognized the urgent necessity to evolve judicial remedies alongside technology. Acknowledging that the rights of a public figure cannot be "rendered otiose" by technological abuse, the Court emphasized the role of a 'dynamic+ injunction'—a modern tool that allows plaintiffs to seek takedowns for future infringing content without needing to initiate fresh litigation for every single violation.
Highlighting the gravity of the situation, the bench noted:
> "If allowed to continue in the manner it will soon spread like a pandemic with wide uncontrollable repercussions, especially, since it is a social media platform(s) herein happen to be the internet portal(s). If not stopped, the chances that (wrong) message will spread like wild fire with hardly any water left to douse it."
Addressing the deceptive nature of the infringing websites, the Court remarked:
> "This so-called dangerous edge has become even sharper with the fast-paced evolution of certain ‘hydra-headed’ websites, which, even if blocked/deleted, have the incredible potential to resurface in multitudes as alphanumeric or mirror websites."
The Court stressed that the protection of personality rights is a critical societal concern:
> "The right... cannot be rendered otiose in this world of rapidly developing technology and for that, enforcement of intellectual property rights on any social platform... ought to be visible and effective."
The final order mandates that the identified defendants cease all unauthorized use of the plaintiffs’ likeness and persona. Crucially, the Court directed the relevant authorities (DoT/MEITY) and social media platforms to implement an agile takedown mechanism for any content that the plaintiffs can identify as infringing in the future.
This judgment serves as a stern warning to those utilizing AI as a weapon for fraud. By streamlining the enforcement process, the Delhi High Court has set a powerful precedent, ensuring that the protection of an individual's image—a fundamental facet of personal identity—remains enforceable even in the chaotic, borderless landscape of the internet.
AI-generated content - Deepfakes - Digital identity - Online fraud - Publicity rights - Intellectual property
#PersonalityRights #DynamicInjunction
Blanket Stay on Charge-Sheet Filing Under BNSS S.193(3) Impermissible: Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order, Orders SIT Probe in Society Land Fraud
13 May 2026
Disaster Authority Must Pay Rent for All Rooms in Requisitioned Premises Irrespective of Occupation: Kerala HC under Section 66 DMA 2005
13 May 2026
Uttarakhand HC Stays Review DPC on 'Own Merit' for Nursing Promotions Citing Supreme Court Undertaking and DoPT OM
13 May 2026
Kerala HC Notices Mahindra in PIL for Vehicle Service Law
13 May 2026
Adanis Consent to $18M SEC Penalty in Fraud Case
15 May 2026
MP High Court Orders CBI Probe into Abetment of Suicide by Excise Officer Despite Forensic Doubts on Video Note: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
15 May 2026
Calcutta High Court Allows TMC Leader to Contest Re-poll
19 May 2026
Judges Inquiry Committee Submits Report to Lok Sabha Speaker
19 May 2026
Bail Jurisdiction Under Section 483 BNSS Limited to Petitioner's Liberty: Supreme Court
22 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.