Personality and Publicity Rights Infringement
Subject : Civil Law - Intellectual Property Rights
In a significant move to address the growing menace of AI-generated impersonation, the Delhi High Court has granted an ex parte ad interim and "dynamic+" injunction in favor of spiritual leader Sadhguru Jagadish Vasudev and the Isha Foundation. The ruling aims to curb the widespread unauthorized use of his likeness, voice, and persona to facilitate fraudulent financial and product scams across digital platforms.
The dispute arose as the plaintiffs discovered a series of "rogue websites" and social media accounts deploying sophisticated AI tools to manipulate the spiritual leader's voice and imagery. These doctored contents were used to create false narratives—such as fake news reports about his detention—or to promote dubious financial schemes and health products. The court noted that these infringing sites operate like "hydra-headed" entities; blocking one often leads to the mushrooming of dozens of identical or near-identical "mirror" sites.
The plaintiffs argued that the unauthorized usage of Sadhguru’s personality rights was not only harming his global reputation but was also defrauding the public. The legal team highlighted that the defendants utilized advanced voice cloning and deepfake technology to build credibility for investment platforms and commercial products without consent.
Counsel for the plaintiffs emphasized that in a world of rapidly evolving technology, protecting a public figure's identity from malicious AI-driven misuse is essential not just for the individual, but to uphold public trust and integrity in digital discourse.
The court’s decision to grant a "dynamic+" injunction reflects a proactive stance against modern digital piracy. Recognizing the technological complexity of the situation, the Court noted: > "This so-called dangerous edge has become even sharper with the fast-paced evolution of certain ‘hydra-headed’ websites, which, even if blocked/ deleted, have the incredible potential to resurface in multitudes as alphanumeric or mirror websites."
By invoking this remedy, the court has authorized the plaintiffs to notify the concerned authorities (such as DoT and MEITY) to block newly discovered infringing websites or social media channels as they appear, without needing to return to court for a fresh injunction for every iteration of the fraud.
The judgment underscores the judiciary's willingness to adapt to the realities of the AI age:
The High Court has ordered the suspension and disabling of specific domains and social media accounts identified in the plaint. Furthermore, it has empowered the plaintiffs to approach service providers to remove deepfake content within a 36-hour window should new instances be discovered.
This ruling stands as a stern warning to operators of rogue platforms that exploit celebrity personas through AI. For legal practitioners, the decision reinforces the utility of the "dynamic+" approach in protecting intellectual property and personality rights in the age of generative AI, where the pace of infringement far outstrips traditional litigation timelines. The case is now listed for further proceedings on October 14, 2025.
View the social posts created for this story.
AI-generated content - deepfakes - digital impersonation - publicity rights - rogue websites - online scam
#PersonalityRights #DigitalLawIndia
Accommodation Requests Do Not Constitute Mala Fide Transfers: MP High Court Upholds Government Authority
23 Jun 2026
Denial of 7th Pay Commission to NHM Employees Despite Approved Service Bye-laws is Arbitrary: Punjab & Haryana High Court
23 Jun 2026
Arbitrary Termination of Long-Term Workers Illegal: Orissa HC
29 Jun 2026
POCSO Court Awards Death Penalty to 65-Year-Old Convict
30 Jun 2026
Senior Citizens Act Cannot Be Invoked for Title Disputes Unless Section 23 Applies: Allahabad High Court
04 Jul 2026
Vague And Nebulous Allegations Do Not Warrant Judicial Interference In Policy Matters: Patna High Court
04 Jul 2026
12-Year Possession Mandatory To Resist Land Eviction: Jharkhand HC
04 Jul 2026
Allahabad High Court Refuses To Quash Statewide ATS Probe Into Funding Of 4,000 Unaided Madrassas
04 Jul 2026
Advocates Have No Right to Demand Out-Of-Turn Listing of Cases: Madras High Court
07 Jul 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.