Allows Officers To Access Premises After Eviction
The on Wednesday directed the to allow two officers of the to visit its premises and collect their belongings and other items, following the eviction of the club’s from the property. Justice Amit Mahajan passed the while hearing a challenge to the government’s decision to derecognise and evict the 107-year-old institution.
A Century-Old Institution Faces Eviction
The , formerly known as the , has been operating from its premises at Park Lane, New Delhi since . The dispute arose when the issued a on , followed by an from the Estate Officer on . The authorities took possession of the premises on , and the club’s were subsequently evicted.
The club challenged both orders in a , arguing that they were arbitrary and unconstitutional. According to the petition, the trouble began in when the DoPT constituted an to conduct elections for a two-month period. The club alleged that this committee unlawfully continued for nearly two years, exceeded its mandate, and was responsible for numerous financial and administrative irregularities, including delayed GST filings, non-payment of , and illegal payments.
Court Grants Interim Access
When the matter came up for hearing, the court noted that the had already been evicted and that the possession of the premises had been taken over. Since the case could not be finally heard due to time constraints—the court was only available until 3:30 PM on account of a farewell gathering for Hon’ble Ms. Justice Chandrasekharan Sudha—Justice Mahajan passed an .
“The respondents are directed to permit two officers of the petitioner, to visit the subject premises and collect all their belongings and other items, the list of which shall be provided to the respondents after visiting the property,” the court ordered.
The court further directed that after the list is provided, the authorities shall take steps to facilitate the collection of those goods by the club. Central Government Standing Counsel was requested to coordinate with the concerned officers and the department to ensure compliance within two weeks.
Key Observations
The court recorded that “undisputedly, the petitioner was running the Club at property bearing No. 07C to 10C, Park Lane, Type 5A, New Delhi since the year ” and that “the possession of the premises has been taken over pursuant to the impugned order whereby the petitioner’s control over the Club and consequently, the property was derecognized.” It also noted that “the of the petitioner have since been evicted from the property.”
What Next?
The matter has been listed for further hearing on , with the earlier fixed date of being cancelled. The club is seeking quashing of the DoPT and the , arguing that the authorities are “attempting to weaponize” their own administrative failures to “forcefully dispossess and extinguish” a historic institution, in violation of and . The ensures that the club’s officers can at least retrieve their personal belongings while the legal battle continues.