Sunanda Pushkar Death Probe
Subject : Criminal Law - Murder
Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Intervention in
New Delhi:
The Delhi High Court today rejected a PIL seeking its intervention in the ongoing probe into the death of Congress MP Shashi Tharoor's wife
"FIR has been registered and the investigation is also being carried out by the senior-most officers of the Delhi Police. We are sorry, we cannot entertain the petition. This is not a Public Interest Litigation (PIL)," a bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw said.
The bench further said that the petition seemed to be a "publicity interest litigation."
The court's observation came after additional solicitor general
ASG said the petitioner has no locus standi in the matter and the police was investigating the case on day to day basis.
He further said that a Special Investigation Team (SIT) has been constituted including five senior most officers of the Delhi Police who were probing the matter.
ASG also said that an FIR has been registered and the petitioner by this kind of prayer was only trying to delay the probe.
Earlier on January 28, the High Court had declined the request of petitioner NGO Anti-Corruption Front to give an urgent hearing to the matter.
The PIL, filed against Home Ministry, CBI and Delhi Police, alleged that an FIR had been lodged by the police almost a year after the incident, despite clear guidelines by Supreme Court and high courts that on receiving information on a cognisable offence, an FIR should be registered without delay.
The SIT was set up by the Delhi Police to probe
The police had questioned Lok Sabha MP Shashi Tharoor , a former UN diplomat and Union Minister in connection with the case on December 19.
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) - Publicity Interest Litigation - Sunanda Pushkar Death Probe - Delhi High Court - Murder Investigation - Special Investigation Team (SIT) - Cognisable Offence - Autopsy Report - Lok Sabha MP - Poisoning
#SunandaPushkarDeathProbe #DelhiHighCourt #PublicInterestLitigation
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.