Personality and Publicity Rights
Subject : Civil Law - Intellectual Property Rights
In a significant judicial development for the protection of celebrity rights in the digital age, the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi has granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favor of actor Abhishek Bachchan. Presided over by Justice Tejas Karia, the court acted to restrain various entities from infringing upon the plaintiff’s personality and publicity rights, particularly through the unauthorized use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and deepfake technology.
The lawsuit arises from the widespread, unauthorized commercial exploitation of Abhishek Bachchan’s name, image, likeness, and signature by multiple online platforms. These entities, including e-commerce sites and YouTube channels, were allegedly using the actor's identity to sell merchandise like T-shirts, stickers, and posters, or creating disparaging or misleading AI-generated content. The plaintiff contended that this not only violated his personality rights but also threatened his goodwill, reputation, and livelihood.
Counsel for the plaintiff emphasized that the actor maintains a highly selective approach to brand endorsements to preserve the "trust" and "quality" associated with his public persona. The unauthorized use of his identity by various defendants, including AI-driven YouTube channels creating "unsavoury" content, was presented as a direct threat to his privacy and dignity. The plaintiff argued that his persona holds distinct commercial value, and its unauthorized appropriation amounts to passing off and infringement of his performer’s rights.
Justice Tejas Karia drew upon established legal precedents to underscore the necessity of judicial intervention. The court referenced *
The court highlighted the following pivotal reasoning in its order:
The High Court has issued a comprehensive injunction, restraining the defendants from using, exploiting, or misappropriating the plaintiff’s name, voice, image, or likeness via any technology, including AI and machine learning. Furthermore, the court directed the offending platforms to disable the specific URLs identified in the suit within 72 hours. Google LLC and other relevant entities were ordered to provide basic subscriber information to help identify the operators of these infringing channels. This ruling serves as a robust shield for public figures against the digital hijacking of their identities and sets a clear precedent for the legal consequences of unauthorized AI-driven content generation. The matter is next listed for hearing on January 15, 2026.
personality-rights - publicity-rights - injunction - artificial-intelligence - intellectual-property
#PersonalityRights #IntellectualProperty
Kerala High Court Salutes R. Rajesh's Supreme Sacrifice, Urges Vigilance in Kochi Flood Prevention
08 Aug 2026
Supreme Court Backs Balanced Calcutta High Court Order on TMC Frozen Accounts in ED Probe
12 Aug 2026
Subsisting Contract Cannot Create Continuing Cause of Action for Time-Barred Debt: Supreme Court
13 Aug 2026
Supreme Court Records Centre's Assurance That Pre-2026 Transgender Identity Cards Stay Valid
17 Aug 2026
Allahabad High Court Grants Bail to Javed Akhtar in GST ITC Fraud Case, Citing Undue Delay
19 Aug 2026
SC Collegium Recommends Appointing Advocate, Judicial Officer to Gauhati High Court
19 Aug 2026
Supreme Court Rules Caste Abuse Inside Closed Room Not Public View Under SC/ST Act
21 Aug 2026
Bombay High Court Pulls Up BMC for Defying Assurance on Bandra Football Ground
21 Aug 2026
RPNLUP Denies Recruitment Irregularities, Files Police Complaint Amid State Law Department Inquiry
21 Aug 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.