Patent Law
Subject : Civil Law - Intellectual Property Law
In a significant ruling for the pharmaceutical industry, the Delhi High Court has dismissed an appeal challenging the rejection of a patent application for a sustained-release formulation of exenatide. Presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tejas Karia, the court affirmed that the proposed invention lacked an "inventive step" as required under Section 2(1)(ja) of the Patents Act, 1970, citing extensive prior art.
The appellants, Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, sought patent protection for a "manufactured pre-mixed formulation for injection" using exenatide—a drug primarily used for Type 2 diabetes. The core of their application focused on a formulation containing microspheres suspended in a non-aqueous carrier comprising triglycerides of C6 to C12 fatty acids.
The Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs had previously rejected the application in 2018, arguing that the combination of elements claimed—specifically the use of pre-mixed formulations and specific stabilizers—would have been obvious to a Person Skilled in the Art (PSITA) based on existing literature.
The appellants argued that their invention bridged a critical gap in medical delivery, eliminating the need for daily injections and offering superior stability and patient compliance. They contended that neither the specific non-aqueous carrier nor the precise combination of ingredients was disclosed in the cited prior art (D1-D4). They further emphasized that their formulation provides a "one-component" solution that avoids the complexities and potential risks of standard two-component systems.
Conversely, the Respondent maintained that the claimed formulation was merely a predictable development. The Counsel for the Respondent demonstrated how prior art references—specifically D1 (microsphere systems), D2 (GLP-1 analogues and stabilizers), and D4 (sustained-release polypeptides)—already contained
View the social posts created for this story.
inventive step - sustained release - pharmaceutical formulation - prior art - non-obviousness - pharmacokinetics
#PatentLaw #DelhiHighCourt
Supreme Court Rules States Cannot Cite Financial Burden To Delay Judges Retiring At Sixty-Two
06 Aug 2026
Rajasthan High Court Demands Comprehensive Affidavit To Remove Encroachments Affecting Critical Ramgarh Dam Water Flow
06 Aug 2026
How Does Algorithmic Bias In Forest Governance Impact Adivasi Rights In Modern India Today?
06 Aug 2026
Christ University Pune Lavasa Hosts International Conference On Indian Knowledge Systems And Global Governance
06 Aug 2026
Bombay High Court Rules Pre-2015 Unilateral Arbitrator Appointments Valid if Contractually Authorized by Agreement
06 Aug 2026
Madras High Court orders TASMAC to issue bills for every liquor sale amid overcharging row
07 Aug 2026
Ernst & Young Announces Applications for Senior Associate Role in Legal Practice
08 Aug 2026
Kerala High Court Salutes R. Rajesh's Supreme Sacrifice, Urges Vigilance in Kochi Flood Prevention
08 Aug 2026
Supreme Court Backs Balanced Calcutta High Court Order on TMC Frozen Accounts in ED Probe
12 Aug 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.