Right to Privacy
Subject : Constitutional Law - Fundamental Rights
The High Court of Delhi has intervened in an ongoing dispute between M/s Genesis Enterprises and the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) authorities. In a significant interim order, the bench led by Prathiba M. Singh, J, and Shail Jain, J, has prohibited tax officials from accessing or viewing memory cards seized during a recent search operation, pending further judicial review.
The case stems from an investigative raid conducted on July 22, 2025, by the CGST Department, Delhi East, with assistance from the CGST Department, Noida. During this operation, investigators searched the residential premises of the petitioner’s partner, Shri Abhishek Gumber, and seized a variety of electronic gadgets, including hard drives and memory cards.
The petitioner approached the High Court challenging the legality of the seizure. The core of their grievance lies in the inclusion of two memory cards extracted from the residence’s CCTV system. The petitioner contends that these devices contain sensitive, private data of family members, including recordings of female residents, thereby infringing upon the fundamental right to privacy.
Counsel for the petitioner argued that the seizure was unauthorized and impermissible, as it extended beyond commercial records into the deeply personal spheres of the petitioner’s life. They urged the Court to direct the removal of these devices from the investigative record to protect family privacy.
In response, the counsel for the CGST Department noted that the petitioner has filed multiple, interlinked petitions, emphasizing the complexity of the ongoing investigation. The department requested that the matter be viewed within the broader context of the nine petitions currently filed by the same entity.
The Court underscored the gravity of the privacy concerns raised, particularly regarding the potential for overreach in search and seizure operations involving residential premises. Key excerpts from the judicial record include:
Acknowledging the potential for irreparable harm to the privacy of the occupants, the High Court directed that all petitions filed by M/s Genesis Enterprises be consolidated and listed on September 15, 2025.
Crucially, the Court has placed a strict "hands-off" order on the digital evidence retrieved from the CCTV cameras. By prohibiting the CGST Department from viewing or opening these specific files until the next hearing, the Court has established a protective boundary between investigative necessity and the constitutional right to privacy. The official responsible for the seizure has also been ordered to appear in court to assist in further deliberations.
surveillance - privacy - investigation - seizure - data - confidentiality
#RightToPrivacy #GST
Rajya Sabha Bill Seeks To Criminalize Vande Mataram Disruption Under The National Honour Act
27 Jul 2026
Will Competitive Exams Deplete Delhi District Courts of Judges During Crucial Trial Proceedings This Year?
27 Jul 2026
Bombay High Court Adjourns Defamation Case Involving Union Minister Nitin Gadkari And Online Media Platforms
28 Jul 2026
Rajasthan High Court Directs State to Form Separate Wings for Crime Investigation and Security
28 Jul 2026
Gujarat High Court Upholds Constitutionality Of CGST Section 16 2 c Denying Unpaid Input Tax
28 Jul 2026
Punjab and Haryana High Court Issues New Guidelines For Legal Aid Defense Counsel System
28 Jul 2026
Government Introduces Public Examinations Amendment Bill 2026 In Lok Sabha To Curb Exam Paper Leaks
28 Jul 2026
Should Delhi High Court Increase Pecuniary Jurisdiction of District Courts to ₹10 Crore Threshold?
28 Jul 2026
Government Disclosure Reveals Urgent Staffing Crisis Across Numerous Regional Armed Forces Tribunal India Benches
29 Jul 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.