The has directed the to file an affidavit explaining why it has not constituted the and what steps it has taken to fulfil its duties under the . The direction came after the government expressed inability to provide a 24-hour male attendant to a child suffering from muscular dystrophy, a under the Act.
A division bench of Justice Subramonium Prasad and Justice Renu Bhatnagar was hearing an appeal filed by Smt Rani Devi, the mother of the child, challenging a order dated . That order had dismissed her application seeking compliance with an earlier direction issued on , which had required the , and the to provide the attendant. The government had stated that no scheme run by the provided for a male attendant at the child’s residence.
The court observed that the government’s stance effectively amounted to abandoning its
.
"A perusal of the
and the duties cast upon the State therein, does not indicate that the State can
,"
the bench noted.
Government’s Inability Challenged
During the proceedings, , counsel for the appellant, submitted that the child is covered under , which defines . He argued that under , the government shall endeavour to ensure that persons with disabilities are provided with arrangements enabling them to . This includes access to and necessary for living and community inclusion.
Counsel further drew attention to , which mandates the establishment of a to provide financial support and welfare measures. The submission was that the government cannot evade its duty by claiming lack of manpower or absence of a specific scheme.
The court agreed that the provisions of the Act do not permit the government to give up on its obligations. The bench noted that the impugned order showed the state had "thrown up its hands" by expressing inability to provide manpower for fulfilling its duties under the .
Court’s Directive and Next Steps
The court directed the government to file a detailed affidavit within four weeks clarifying whether the State Fund under has been constituted. The affidavit must also outline what steps are being taken to fulfil the responsibilities enumerated under .
"The Government is directed to file an affidavit detailing as to whether the Fund as stipulated under
has been constituted or not and what steps are being taken by the Government to fulfill its responsibilities as enumerated under
,"
the order stated.
The matter has been listed for further hearing on . The court’s intervention comes at a time when families caring for children with severe disabilities often struggle to obtain adequate support from state machinery. The mother in this case had been pursuing the matter since 2022, when the first directed the authorities to provide the attendant.
The
’s observation that the government cannot
"
"
underscores the
under the
. The case highlights the gap between
and
, particularly in providing
for persons with disabilities.
The outcome of the next hearing will be closely watched by disability rights advocates, as it may for how the allocates resources and fulfils its obligations under the Act. The court has made it clear that the state must actively work towards ensuring that persons with disabilities can live with dignity and receive the they need.