Subject :
O R D E R
1. Permission to appear and argue in person is granted.
2. Applications seeking exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing official translation are allowed including Interlocutory Applications No.241194, 241195 and
241143/2023.
3. The petitioner-husband who appears in-person has assailed the orders dated 21st February, 2022, passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dismissing an appeal preferred by the petitioner- husband and upholding the order dated 28th February 2018, passed by the trial Court granting divorce in a petition filed by the respondent-wife. The petitioner-husband has also challenged an order dated 14th October, 2021 passed by the High Court dismissing an application filed by him against an earlier order dated 21st May, 2019 directing him to pay a sum of ₹15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) to the respondent-wife as interim maintenance in terms of an offer made by him.
4. After addressing arguments at some length, the petitioner- husband submits that he may be permitted to confine the relief in SLP (CIVIL) Diary No.22791/2023 to expungement of the observations made by the trial Court in para 19 of the judgment dated 28th February, 2018 relating to impotency arguing that the respondent-wife had not filed the petition for divorce on the grounds of impotency and therefore, there was no occasion for the Court to have made any observations on the above aspect.
5. Further, the petitioner-husband states that he has no objection to the order granting divorce in favour of the respondent-wife and is willing to pay her a sum of ₹5,50,000/- (Rupees Five lakhs fifty thousand only) in terms of the order passed on 21st May, 2019 and upheld by the High Court on 14th October, 2021 but states that despite the decree of divorce granted in favour of the respondent-wife she is continuing to pursue a petition under Sections 498A/406/506 of the Indian Penal Code which may be closed on his paying the aforesaid amount.
6. Delay condoned. Limited to the aforesaid aspect, issue notice to the respondent-wife.
7. List after service is complete.
(Geeta Ahuja) (Dipti Khurana )
Assistant Registrar-cum-PS Assistant Registra r
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.