SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1200

1996(1) Supreme 24
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J. S. Verma, N. P. Singh and K. Venkataswami, JJ.
Janata Dal (Samajwadi) -Appellant
versus
The Election Commission of India
 -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 1629 (NCE) of 1993
Decided on 23.11.95

IMPORTANT POINT
A party once recognised as National Party or a State Party cannot claim the recognition in perpetuity. The recognition is withdrawable if it does not show minimum electoral support for continued recognition in terms of paragraphs 6 and 7 of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968.

Headnote:Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968-Paragraphs 6(2) and 7(1), Paras 2(h) and 2(2)-Chief Election Commissioner withdrawing the recognition of Janata Dal (Samajwadi) as a National Party or State Party and as such shall not be entitled to the exclusive use of the symbol "Woman carrying on pot on her head" earlier reserved for it on the basis of election results in April-June, 91 in States of Assam, Haryana, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, U.P., West Bengal & Pondicherry-Whether correct? (Yes) (Paras 7 and 9)-Whether recognition once given can he withdrawn later ? (Yes) (Para 6)-Can it be withdrawn on the basis of results of some states only ? (Yes) (Para 7) (Cross Ref. General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 21 - Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Section 29A).

JUDGMENT

N. P. Singh. J.-The validity of an order dated 21.2.1992 passed by the Chief Election Commissioner of India withdrawing the recognition of Janata Dal (Samajwadi) as a national party, in exercise of the power vested in the Election Commission under paragraphs 6 and 7 of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Symbols Order ) is being questioned in this appeal.

2. The appellant was recognised as a national political party on 16.4.1991. The general elections to the Lok Sabha and to the Legislative Assemblies of the States of Assam, Haryana, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal and the Union Territory of Pondicherry were held in the months of April-June, 1991. A statement showing the number of votes polled by the appellant at the aforesaid general elections held in the months of April-June, 1991 showing the performance of the appellant at the poll was prepared by the Election Commission and thereafter a show cause notice dated 4.12.1991 was issued to the appellant by the Election Commission as to why the recognition of the appellant as a national party should not be withdrawn under the provisions of the Symbols Order. The General Secretary of the appellant responded to the aforesaid notice by his letter dated 15.1.1992 seeking three months time to submit the reply on behalf of the appelant, as the party was collecting information from its State units. The time for filing the reply to the show cause notice was extended. It was filed on 5.2.1992. A stand was taken on behalf of the appellant that once recognition has been given to the party as a national party there was no provision in the Symbols Order for withdrawal of the said recognition. It was also asserted that the performance of a party for purpose of recognition or derecognition has to be judged when the elections are held in all the States within Union of India and not only on basis of elections held in only some of the States. It was pointed out that no elections have been held in respect of State Assemblies of several States like Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Goa, Orissa, etc. However, the impugned order was passed by the Election Commission withdrawing the recognition of the appellant as a national party and forfeiting the right of the party for the exclusive use of the symbol Woman carrying pot on her head, which had earlier been reserved for the appellant. The Election Commission held in the impugned order that a party once recognised cannot claim the recognition in perpetuity and it has to show a minimum electoral support for continued recognition in terms of paragraphs 6 and 7 of the Symbols Order.

3. Paragraph 2(h) of the Symbols Order defines "political party" to mean an association or body of individual citizens of India registered with the Commission as a political party under Section 29(A) of the Respresentation of the People Act, 1951. Paragraph 3 requires every association or body of individual citizens of India to make an application to the Commission for its registration as a political party under Section 29(A) of the aforesaid Act. Symbol is to be alloted to a contesting candidate in accordance with the provisions of the said Order. Paragraphs 6 and 7 which are relevant for the present dispute are reproduced below :-

"6. Classification of political parties- (1) For the purposes of this Order and for such other purposes as the Commission may specify as and when necessity therefor arises, political parties are either recognised political parties or unrecognised political parties.

(2) A political party shall be treated as a recognised political party in a State, if and only if either the conditions specified in clause (A) are, or the condition specified in clause (B) is, fulfilled by that party and not otherwise, that is to say-

(A) that such party-

(a) has been engaged in political activity for a continuous period of five years; and

(b) has, at the general election



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top