SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 58

1996(1) Supreme 737
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy and G.B. Pattanaik, JJ.
M/s. National Aluminium Co. Ltd. -Appellant
versus
Raj Kishore @ Sahu Jena & Anr. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2239 of 1996
Decided on 9-1-1996

IMPORTANT POINT
A beneficiary is entitled to be impleaded as a party in the pending proceedings in the court.

Headnote:Constitution of India-Article 136 -Appeal by special leave-Prayer by appellant to be impleaded as party in the pending proceedings-Held being beneficiary he is entitled to be impleaded in view of JT 1994(7) SC 304. (Para 2)

ORDER

Leave granted.

2. Though notice was served on the respondents, no one has appeared for the first respondent-claimant. The controversy is no longer res interga. They are covered by the judgment of this Court in U.P. Avas Vikas Evam Parishad v. Gyan Devi [Dead] by Lrs. & Ors.1. In that view, the appellant being beneficiary is entitled to be impleaded as a party in the pending proceedings in the court of Subordinate Judge, Angul.

3. The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs.

Appeal allowed

*******

Parallel Citations of other Journals :

M/s. National Aluminium Co. Ltd. v. Raj Kishore, 1996(1) Supreme 737 : JT 1996(1) SC 617

00021

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top