G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
Nutanarvind – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
ORDER
Leave granted.
2. This appeal by special leave arises from the order dated December 22, 1994 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No. 1796 of 1989.
3. We had issued notice to the respondents to show to this Court whether the consideration for promotion was on merit and ability or seniority-cum-merit and what was the principle that was followed in grading the Officers by the DPC. Pursuant to the said notice, learned counsel for the Union of India has brought to our notice the instructions issued by the Government of India and was in vogue prior to May 12, 1988. The Administrative Instructions contained in Memorandum of the Government dated 17th May, 1957 which was approved by this Court in Union of India etc. v. Majji Jangamayya etc.1. This Court had accepted the criteria laid down in those instructions which were as under :
"1. Greater emphasis should be laid on merit as a criterion.
2. The Departmental Promotion Committee should first decided the field of choice, namely, the number of eligible officers awaiting promotion who should be considered for inclusion in the selection list. An officer of outstanding
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.