SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 718

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, K.S.PARIPOORNAN
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Trigon Investment And Trading Private LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B. P. Jeevan Reddy, J.-Leave granted. Heard counsel for both the parties.

2. This appeal is preferred by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (Corporation) against the judgment and order of the Delhi High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by it. The matter pertains to assessment of property tax. Ms. Madhu Tewatia, learned counsel for the appellant-Corporation, submits that the problem arising herein is a common one and the decisions of the nature questioned herein are resulting in loss of substantial revenue legitimately due to the Corporation and, therefore, the questions arising herein must be decided by this Court authoritatively to serve as a guidance to the authorities under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (Act).

3. Saket Properties Private Limited constructed a multi-storeyed building on Plot No. 21, Yusuf Sarai Community Centre, New Delhi. Flats Nos. 302, 303 and 305 on the third floor of the said building were allotted to the respondent-Trigon Investment and Trading Private Limited - under a letter of allotment dated February 29,1984 (Annexure R-l) subject to the terms and conditions mentioned therein. The respondent accepted the allotment and pai


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top