SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 925

SUHAS C. SEN, B. L. HANSARIA, A. M. AHMADI
Assistance Collector Of Central Excise: Modi Rubber LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Bata India LTD. : Union Of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sen, J.-The only point that falls for determination in this appeal is whether the benefit of exemption given to footwear can be claimed by the manufacturer even where the wholesale price of the footwear exceeds the limit of the exemption specified in the notification. There can be no dispute that if the assessable value calculated according to Section 4 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, comes upto or below the limit set by the notification, the assessee will be entitled to the benefit of the notification.

2. The notification which was originally issued under sub-rule (1) of Rule 8 of Central Excise Rules, 1944 exempted footwear the value of which did not exceed Rs. 5/- per pair from the whole of the duty of excise leviable thereon. The exemption limit of Rs. 5/- per pair has been enhanced from time to time and at the material time, for the purpose of this case, the exemption was limited to footwear the value of which was upto Rs. 60/- per pair.

3. Mr. Shanti Bhushan on behalf of the respondent has contended that if excise duty was payable on these shoes, the amount of excise duty had to be deducted from the wholesale price in order to determine the assessable value of the











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top