SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 875

1996(4) Supreme 763
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy and G.B. Pattanaik, JJ.
C.V. Raja Rao & Anr. -Appellants
versus
Mirza Basheer Baig & Ors. -Respondents
Crl. Appeal No.662 of 1996
(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 261/92)
Decided on 30-4-1996

Headnote:Constitution of India-Article 136-Criminal Procedure Code, 1973-Sections 145 and 146-Proceedings under-Dispute regarding land of an extent of 4922 sq. yds.-High Court quashed proceedings of initiation of action under Sections 145 and 146-Court directed that Survey Department should demarcate land, localise the same-Magistrate would take action pursuant to report thereof-No case warranting interference-Proceedings pending at different stages in different courts will be subject to appropriate orders. (Para 3)

       

ORDER

Leave granted.

2. This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the High Court dated April 2, 1991 made in Criminal Application No.334/91. It is not necessary to narrate in elaboration all the proceedings that have taken place between the parties. Suffice it to state that in respect of the lands bearing Survey No.202 situated in Lallaguda in Secunderabad of Andhra Pradesh which is now part of the city of Hyderabad, an extent of 4922 sq. yds. is in dispute. Several proceedings have taken place between the parties narration of which is not material. The High Court in quashed proceedings of the initiation of the action under Sections 145 and 146 of the Cr.P.C. gave the following directions :

"Since there are some allegations that the police were not giving aid to the petitioners even though there are injunction orders in their favour, I feel it is desirable that some high official of the Survey Department like the Assistant Director of Survey may be directed to inspect the suit land and localise the suit land with the assistance of a Inspector of Survey with reference to the survey records. The learned Magistrate then under Section 146 Cr.P.C. may complete the enquiry expeditiously and pass final orders. Since the parties are fighting out the matter since a long time, the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate is directed to dispose of the matter expeditiously and pass final orders, preferably within a period of three months from today."

3. In view of the above directions, it would be necessary that the Survey Department should demarcate the land, localise the same with the assistance of the Inspector of the Survey and Land Record as directed by the High Court and the Magistrate would take action pursuant to the report thereof according to law. In view of the facts in this case, we think that it is not a case warranting interference under Article 136 of the Constitution. We are not expressing any opinion on merit since proceedings are pending at different stages in different courts. Whatever proceedings have been taken place, will be subject to the appropriate orders.

4. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Appeal accordingly dsmissed.

*******

Parallel Citations of other Journals ;

C.V.Raja Rao & Anr. v. Mirza Basheer Baig & Ors., 1996(4) Supreme 763

00021

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top