SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 587

K.RAMASWAMY, G.T.NANAVATI
Ishwarlal Premchand Shah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

We have heard the counsel on both sides.

2. Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1 of 1894 (For short, the Act ). was published on August 2, 1984 acquiring the lands situated in village Sarigan, District Bulsar in Gujarat State for industrial purpose. Possession also was taken after dispensing with the enquiry under Section 5-A. It is not necessary to dilate on the proceedings taken earlier under Article 226 of the Constitution. Suffice it to state that there was an agreement between the parties that an award could be made under Section 11(2) of the Act pursuant to which the Land Acquisition Officer on June 4, 1991 made the award in terms of the agreement. The appellant challenged the correctness of the award by filing the writ petition which was dismissed by the High Court by the impugned order dated September 10, 1993. Thus these appeals by special leave.

3. This Court by order dated February 28, 1994 issued notice confined to the question whether the appellants are entitled to solatium, interest and additional amount under Sections 23(2), 28 and 23(1-A) of the Act. The respondents have filed their counter-affidavit contending that in vi












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top