SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1093

K.RAMASWAMY, G.B.PATTANAIK
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Labh Singh – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. These appeals arise under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985. The respondents were acquitted on trial on the ground that they were not informed of their valuable right that under Section 50 of the Act they were entitled to be searched in the presence of a Gazetted Officer. Violation thereof vitiates the trial as the accused have the statutory right to be searched. The absence of their information as to the said right is one of the infirmities to the validity of their prosecution.

3. The question was considered in State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh1. Subsequently, another Bench of this Court in State of Punjab v. Jasbir Singh2 has pointed out that it would be open to the search officer to inform the suspect, at the time of search, that he is entitled to be searched in the presence of a Gazetted Officer and also to take in writing from the accused that he has been so informed and that the accused has waived that right. thus it would form part of the record as contempraneous evidence. Thereafter, it may not be open to the accused to take the plea of non-compliance of Section 50. It would be for the Court to consider, at the trial, whether the of










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top