SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1050

G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
Punjab State Electricity Board, Mahilpur – Appellant
Versus
Guru Nanak Cold Storage And Ice Factory, Mahilpur – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. This case has a chequered history, the entire narration of which is not material to the controversy at hand. Suffice it to State that pursuant to the default committed by the respondent in payment of the dues, the appellant-Board had disconnected the supply of electrical energy on 20.8.1982. For the recovery of the arrears, the appellant had laid the suit. Ultimately, the suit ended in the order passed by this Court in C.A. No. 2767 of 1987 on February 15, 1989 upholding the decree for recovery of the arrears for the disconnection of the supply of electrical energy; the respondent had a notice issued on August 1, 1985 claiming damages in a sum of Rs. 68,25,734/- which, we are informed, subsequently increased to over Rs. 93,00,694.00. Therein, the respondent called upon the appellant to refer the dispute to an arbitration under Section 52 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 (for short, the Electricity Act ) or under Section 76(2) of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 (for short, Supply Act ). Calling that notice in question, the appellant filed suit No. 291 of 1985 on the file of the Sub-Judge, I class for declaration and also for permanent injunction restrai



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top