ORDER

Leave granted. Though notice was served on the respondents-the first and the fourth respondents, the 1st respondent is not appearing either in person or throughcounsel; equally, 4th respondent through counsel. We have heard the counsel for the appellant as well as for the State.

2. The undisputed facts are that the appellant- Society consists of labourers and Scheduled Caste persons belonging to the village Khardosan in Deesa Taluka of Banaskantha District of Gujarat State. The appellant-society had requested the Gram Panchayat to recommend to the District Collector for assignment of 300 acres of gaucher land (waste land) vested in the Gram Panchayat for the purpose of cultivation and augmentation of economic empowerment of the members of the appellant-Society. The Gram Panchayat had unanimusly resolved and requested the Collector to resume the land and assign it to the appellant. The District Collector in response thereto had resumed the land and assigned the same to the appellant. Calling the order of the District Collector in question a Review Petition was filed before the Government by the first res- pondent. The Government by order dated August 20, 1986 set aside the ord