SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1294

S.SAGHIR AHMAD, G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Dhanwanti Devi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K. Ramaswamy, J.-Application for impleadment allowed.

Leave granted.

2. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and order dated September 29, 1992 passed by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir in CIMA No. 72 of 1988.

3. The only question that arises for decision in this appeal is: whether the respondents are entitled to solatium and interest under the Jammu & Kashmir Requisition and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act")?

4. The facts in nutshell are that land admeasuring 399 kanals and 4 marlas situated in Villages Rampur, Talwal and Goverdhan Plain was acquired for public purposes, viz., defence, by publication of notification under Section 7 of the Act on October 16, 1986. The Deputy Commissioner, Rajouri in his award dated November 3, 1986 awarded compensation @ Rs. 21,000/- in respect of lands situated in villages Rampur and Talwal and Rs. 10,000/- per kanal in respect of land situated in village Goverdhan Pain with 10 escalation on account of passage of time. The compensation was accordingly paid but feeling dissatisfied therewith, the claimants-landowners sought reference under Section 8 of the Act to the arbitrato


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top