SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1554

1996(7) Supreme 661
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dr. A.S. Anand and K.T. Thomas, JJ.
Balbir Singh -Appellant
versus
State -Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 641 of 1996
Decided on 26-9-1996
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : Goodwill Indeevar, Sant Lal Nayar and P.S. Sharma, Advocates.
For the Respondent : Mrs. K. Amareshwari, Sr. Advocate, Shambhu Pd. Singh, and B. Krishna Prashad, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
When the appellant was found to be in possession of 161 live cartridges consciously and unauthorisedly in a notified area, this recovery by itself would attract the provisions of Section 5 of TADA.

Headnote:Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987-Section 5-Conviction under-Appeal-Appellant found in conscious possession of rifle with live cartridges-Appellant had no licence for such a weapon--Unauthorised possession- Recovery made from area which was a declared notified area-All ingredients essential for proving offence u/s 5 stand established--Prosecution case based on testimony of departmental witnesses-Conviction legally sustainable-Sentence of 8 years R.I. reduced to a period of 6 years-Sentence of fine maintained.

       Held : In the present case there is ample evidence on the record to show that the appellant was in conscious possession of rifle Ex.P1 bearing No. 516275 which weapon answered the description of an arm under the Arms Act as per the report of the CFSL. The appellant had no licence for such a weapon and was thus in an unauthorised possession of the same. There is no dispute that the recovery was made from the area which was a declared notified area. All the ingredients essential for proving of an offence under section 5 of TADA stand established in the case and his conviction is well merited. (Para 8)

       Further held : None of the prosecution witnesses who have been examined bore any ill will or malice against the appellant. Of course, they all belong to the police force but merely on that account their evidence cannot be said to be tainted. Since the departmental witnesses would be interested in the success of the prosecution case prudence requires that their evidence be scrutinized with more care. We have critically and carefully analysed the evidence of all the prosecution witnesses and find that despite lengthy cross-examination nothing has been brought out which may in any way discredit their testimony at all. These witnesses had no reason to falsely implicate the appellant. They have stood the test of cross-examination. The report of the CFSL lends enough corroboration to their evidence. It is in the evidence of PW.1 that when the appellant was over-powered, some persons were looking from a distance but none of them came at the spot. Under these circumstances not joining any of those witnesses cannot affect the credit-worthiness of the prosecution case. (Para 6)

       EVIDENCE-TADA-Section 5-Conviction based on witnesses belonging to police force-Whether sustainable?-(Yes). (Para 6)

       

ORDER

This appeal under Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter called the TADA ) is directed against the judgment and order dated 14th February, 1996 by which the appellant has been convicted for an offence under Section 5 of TADA and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for eight years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.

2. The prosecution case against the appellant is that on 6th April, 1992, PW.1 H.C. Maru Ram, who was incharge of PCR Van No. Victor 79, Maruti Gypsy bearing registration No. DDV 6920 based in Kailash Colony, alongwith constable Chander Pal and driver constable Raj Kumar, received a wireless message at about 2.05 p.m. to the effect that a person wearing green coloured pant, green coloured shoes and having a green coloured bag was present in suspicious circumstances and that if his bag was searched it might show presence of some contraband. On receipt of this information, PW.1 alongwith the other members of the police party proceeded towards Relax Restaurant. On reaching Relax Restaurant, an enquiry was made from the owner of the Restaurant if he had seen any person with that description but he replied in the negative. In the meantime it was noticed that the appellant was sitting in a park at a short distance. He was wearing green coloured shoes, green coloured pant and had a green coloured bag with him. The police party reached near him. He became perplexed and tried to open the bag. He was however overpowered. Constable Chander Pal, PW.2 snatched the bag from the appellant. On checking the bag, a rifle and some cartridges besides an empty megazine and a megazine containing live cartridges, fitted with the rifle were recovered. The appellant alongwith the seized articles was proceeded towards P.S. Greater Kailash and at the gate of the Police Station, S.I. Sukhbir Singh and Constable Pankaj met the police party. The bag containing 137 live cartridges and the megazine fitted with the rifle containing 24 live cartridges were taken into possession alongwith the rifle. Inside the green coloured bag there were two other bags. There was one patka also in the bag besides one white coloured bed sheet and a pink coloured bed sheet. Certain printed papers containing the name of Khalistan Armed Forces (Udhoke) were also recovered. On the rifle there was a sticker with the inscription in Gurmukhi "Naam Khummari Nanaka Charri Rahe Din Raat". On the magazine also there was a sticker with the inscription " Raj Karega Karega Khalsa" in Gurmukhi. The rifle Ex. P1 alongwith two megazines Ex.P2 and P3 and the live cartridges numbering 161 (24 live cartridges in one megazine besides 137 cartridges) were taken into possession and were sealed into different parcels and sealed with the seal of SBS. The other articles, found from the personal search and from the search of the bags were also sealed into separate parcels and sealed with the seal of SBS. The sealed parcels were deposited with Moharror Malkhana and were later on sent to the Central Forensic Science Laboratory. The report of the Central Forensic Science Laboratory PW9/F shows that the sealed parcels containing the arms and ammunitions with seal of SBS intact were received in the laboratory and on testing the rifle it was found to be in a working order. The ballistic expert opined that the rifle was an arm within the meaning of the Arms Act. One test cartridge was fired from the rifle and it was opined that 161 cartridges which had been recovered were live cartridges. On completion of the investigation, the appellant was tried for the offence under section 5 of TADA and convicted and sentenced as noticed above.

3. The prosecution with a view to connect the appellant with the crime examined nine witnesses. It produced in evidence the affidavit of Moharror Malkahana as also the reports from the CFSL. Various documents including the seizure memos etc. were also p













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top