SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1554

A.S.ANAND, K.T.THOMAS
Balbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


ORDER

This appeal under Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter called the TADA ) is directed against the judgment and order dated 14th February, 1996 by which the appellant has been convicted for an offence under Section 5 of TADA and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for eight years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.

2. The prosecution case against the appellant is that on 6th April, 1992, PW.1 H.C. Maru Ram, who was incharge of PCR Van No. Victor 79, Maruti Gypsy bearing registration No. DDV 6920 based in Kailash Colony, alongwith constable Chander Pal and driver constable Raj Kumar, received a wireless message at about 2.05 p.m. to the effect that a person wearing green coloured pant, green coloured shoes and having a green coloured bag was present in suspicious circumstances and that if his bag was searched it might show presence of some contraband. On receipt of this information, PW.1 alongwith the other members of the police party proceeded towards Relax Restaurant. On reaching Relax Restaurant, an enquiry was made from the owner of the Restaurant if he had s














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top