SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1849

SUHAS C.SEN, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
Commander Head Quarter, Calcutta – Appellant
Versus
Biplabendra Chanda – Respondent


ORDER

Heard the counsel for both the parties.

Leave granted.

2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment of a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court dismissing the writ appeal preferred by the appellants. The respondent was a Commissioned Officer. He retired on May 18, 1982. According to the Rules then in force, only 2/3rd of the pre-commissioned service was allowed to be counted towards qualifying service for earning pensionary benefits. A minimum period of qualifying service was also provided for becoming eligible for pension. On the basis of the said Rule, the respondent was found ineligible for grant of pension and accordingly no pension was granted to him. About four years later, the Rules relating to qualifying service were changed (with effect from January 1, 1986) based upon the recommendations of the Fourth Pay Commission. One of the features of these Rules was that full pre-commissioned service was to be taken into count for working out the qualifying service required for earning pensionary benefits. In other words, whereas previously only 2/3rd of the pre-commissioned service was to be taken into count for determining the eligibility and the quantum of pension, the







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top