1996(8) Supreme 737
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Kuldip Singh and Suhas C. Sen, JJ
Union of India & Anr. -Appellants
versus
U.D. Dwivedi etc. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 15344 of 1996
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1477 of 1992)
With
Civil Appeal No. 15345 of 1996
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 9793 of 1992)
Decided on 3-12-1996
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants : N.N. Goswamy, Sr. Advocate, (S.N. Terdol, Land Mrs. Anil Katiyar) Advocates for Mrs. Sushma Suri, Advocate.
For the Respondents : N.S. Bisht and Umesh Misra, Advocate. (N.P)
JUDGMENT
Sen, J.-Leave granted.
2. U.D. Dwivedi was employed in Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) in 1974 and was working as Scientist B in the pay-scale of Rs.2200-4000, Gazetted Group A DRDS Service at Solid State Physics Laboratory, Timarpur, Delhi with effect from 1st July, 1983. He was working under Dr. A.K. Sreedhar, Director, Solid State Physics Laboratory, Timarpur, Delhi. Dwivedi was assessed by the Assessment Board at Recruitment and Assessment Centre (RAC), Timarpur, on 1.2.1989 for the service period from July, 1983 to June, 1988 for promotion to the post of Scientist C in the pay-scale of Rs.3000-4500 in DRDS. The assessment is called as Assessment Year 1988. The result of the assessment was declared in May, 1989 and Dwivedi was not declared successful in the assessment.
3. Dwivedi challenged the assessment for the year 1988 before the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi. The ground of challenge was that RAC, which conducted the assessment, was set up in an unconstitutional manner because the entire assessment was conducted under the chairmanship of one Professor S. Sampath. Professor Sampath, being a former member of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC), was prohibited from taking up any employment under Union of India or State Government as laid down in Article 319(c) of the Constitution of India. The Tribunal upheld the contention of Dwivedi and held that the Assessment made under the Chairmanship of Professor Sampath was null and void. Union of India has come up in appeal against the order of the Tribunal.
4. The ground taken by the Director General, Research and Development Organisation, Ministry of Defence, is that prior to the issue of GSR-512 dated 1.6.85, promotion and recruitment to scientific and technical posts under DRDO were under the purview of UPSC and all the assessment boards for promotion of scientists prior to the issue of the said GSR were conducted by the UPSC. Appointment and promotion to these posts were, however, excluded from the purview of UPSC by the said GSR. Therefore, Recruitment & Assessment Centre was constituted at DRDO Headquarter headed by a Director to provide secretarial services to the Assessment Board constituted to assess candidates for recruitment to scientific and technical posts and promotion of Scientists to higher posts. Assessment for promotion of Scientists of DRDS to higher grades was made by an Assessment Board consisting of a Chairman nominated by the Government, two departmental officers of appropriate status nominated as members and two outside experts nominated by the Government. It was contended that Professor Sampath, Chairman of the Recruitment and Assessment Centre under DRDO, was not in the employment of the Central Government and was not holding any employment under the Government. He was a full time non-official consultant on contract basis to advise DRDO on the matters of recruitment and assessment of Scientists and Engineers. He functioned as Chairman of Assessment Board constituted for the purpose of recruitment to scientific and technical posts under DRDO. Promotion of Scientists of DRDS to higher grades on the basis of assessment made by RAC was, therefore, valid. A point was also taken that statutory remedies had not been exhausted before coming to the Tribunal.
5. After hearing the parties, we are of the view that the Tribunal has come to a right decision in this matter in holding that the entire process of assessment was bad in law and, therefore, had to be struck down.
Article 319 of the Constitution is as under:
"319. Prohibition as to the holding of offices by members of Commission on ceasing to be such members.-On ceasing to hold office,
(a) the Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission shall be ineligible for further employment either under the Government of India or under the Government of a State;
(b) the Chairman of a State Public Service Commissio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.