B.N.KIRPAL, J.S.VERMA
R. Thiruvirkolam – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer – Respondent
JUDGMENT
J.S. Verma, J.-The appellant was employed as a technician with M/s. Madras Fertilizers Ltd. - Respondent No. 2. He was dismissed from service after a domestic inquiry on November, 18, 1981 on proof of misconduct. The appellant challenged his dismissal before the Labour Court. The Labour Court found the domestic inquiry to be defective and permitted the management to prove the misconduct before it. On the basis of the evidence adduced before the Labour Court, it came to the conclusion that the punishment imposed was justified as the misconduct was duly proved. The Labour Court s order is dated December 11, 1985. Appellant then filed a writ petition before the High Court which was dismissed by a Single Bench. The writ appeal filed by the appellant was also dismissed by a Division Bench of the High Court. Hence this appeal by special leave.
2. The leave granted in this appeal is confined only to the question : whether the dismissal will take effect from the date of the order of the Labour Court, namely, December 11, 1985 or it would relate to the date of the order of dismissal passed by the employer, namely, November 18, 1981.
3. The only point involved for decision is apparentl
P.H. Kalyani v. M/s. Air France, Calcutta
Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. v. Gujarat Steel Tubes Mazdoor Sabha
D.C. Roy v. The Presiding Officer, Madhya Pradesh Industrial Court, Indore & Ors.
Desh Raj Gupta v. Industrial Tribunal IV, U.P. Lucknow & Anr.
Rambahu Vyankuji Kheragade v. Maharashtra Road Transport Corporation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.