SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1924

B.N.KIRPAL, J.S.VERMA
R. Thiruvirkolam – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer – Respondent


JUDGMENT

J.S. Verma, J.-The appellant was employed as a technician with M/s. Madras Fertilizers Ltd. - Respondent No. 2. He was dismissed from service after a domestic inquiry on November, 18, 1981 on proof of misconduct. The appellant challenged his dismissal before the Labour Court. The Labour Court found the domestic inquiry to be defective and permitted the management to prove the misconduct before it. On the basis of the evidence adduced before the Labour Court, it came to the conclusion that the punishment imposed was justified as the misconduct was duly proved. The Labour Court s order is dated December 11, 1985. Appellant then filed a writ petition before the High Court which was dismissed by a Single Bench. The writ appeal filed by the appellant was also dismissed by a Division Bench of the High Court. Hence this appeal by special leave.

2. The leave granted in this appeal is confined only to the question : whether the dismissal will take effect from the date of the order of the Labour Court, namely, December 11, 1985 or it would relate to the date of the order of dismissal passed by the employer, namely, November 18, 1981.

3. The only point involved for decision is apparentl
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top