SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 529

M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, L.M.SHARMA
Desh Raj Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Industrial Tribunal Iv, U. P. , Lucknow – Respondent


Advocates:
ANIL GUPTA, K.Ramamurthy, R.D.UPADHYAY

Judgment

SHARMA, J.:- This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court: (reported in 1983 Lab IC 1548 (All) dismissing the appellants writ petition challenging an award of the Industrial Tribunal.

2. The appellant was working as an Assistant Cashier in the Rampur Zila Sahkari Bank Ltd., when a reference of an industrial dispute was made under S. 4-A of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the U. P. Act). The provisions of the U. P. Act relevant to the present case are similar to those of the Central Act, that is, the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Section 4-A of the U. P. Act, like the corresponding S. 10 of the Central Act, empowers the State Government to refer industrial disputes to Labour Courts or Tribunals. During the pendency of the reference the appellant was put under suspension and served with a charge-sheet in February 1976, which was followed by a domestic inquiry leading to the dismissal of the appellant from service on 16-8-1976. The U. P. Act in Ss. 6-E and 6-F incorporates provisions similar to those in Ss. 33 and 33-A of the Central Act. The appellant filed a complaint under S. 6-F of the U. P. A













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top